繁体中文
设为首页
加入收藏
当前位置:药品说明书与价格首页 >> 肿瘤 >> 黑色素瘤 >> 药品推荐 >> 达拉菲尼硬胶囊|Tafinlar(dabrafenib hard capsules)

达拉菲尼硬胶囊|Tafinlar(dabrafenib hard capsules)

2014-04-15 09:03:10  作者:新特药房  来源:互联网  浏览次数:325  文字大小:【】【】【
简介: 2013年9月4日,黑色素瘤新药Tafinlar(dabrafenib)已获欧盟委员会(EC)批准,作为一种口服靶向药物,用于携带BRAF V600E突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。Dabrafenib是 ...

2013年9月4日,黑色素瘤新药Tafinlar(dabrafenib)获欧盟委员会(EC)批准,作为一种口服靶向药物,用于携带BRAF V600E突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。
Dabrafenib是一种激酶抑制剂,靶向于BRAF蛋白,这是机体内一个生物信号通路中的关键元件,该信号通路调节细胞的正常生长和死亡,包括皮肤细胞。
今年5月,Tafinlar及另一种黑色素瘤新药Mekinist(trametinib)均获得了FDA的批准
Tafinlar为BRAF抑制剂,作为一种单药口服胶囊,适用于携带BRAF V600E突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。Mekinist为首个MEK抑制剂,作为一种单药口服片剂,适用于携带BRAF V600E或V600K突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。
转移性黑色素瘤中,约有一半携带BRAF突变,该异常突变能促使黑色素瘤生长和扩散,其中BRAF V600E突变约占转移性黑色素瘤所有BRAF V600突变的85%,BRAF V600K突变约占转移性黑色素瘤所有BRAF V600突变的10%。
适应证和用途
(1)TAFINLAR是一种激酶抑制剂适用于有不能切除或转移黑色素瘤与用FDA-批准测试检测BRAF V600E 突变患者的治疗。
(2)TAFINLAR与曲美替尼联用是适用为有被FDA批准检验检出BRAF V600E或V600K突变有不可切除的或转移黑色素瘤患者的治疗。联合的使用是根据显示持久反应率。尚未证实对TAFINLAR与曲美替尼联用疾病相关的症状和总体生存的改善。
使用的限制:TAFINLAR不适用为野生型BRAF-抑制剂治疗患者的治疗。
剂量和给药方法
(1)TAFINLAR作为单药开始治疗前确证在肿瘤标本中存在BRAF V600E突变。TAFINLAR与曲美替尼开始联用治疗前确认肿瘤样品中存在BRAF V600E或V600K突变。
(2)TAFINLAR的推荐剂量是150mg口服每天2次作为单药或与曲美替尼联用2mg口服每天1次。餐前至少1小时和餐后至少2小时服用TAFINLAR
剂型和规格
胶囊:50mg,75mg.


Tafinlar 50 mg & 75 mg hard capsules
1. Name of the medicinal product
Tafinlar® 50 mg hard capsules
Tafinlar® 75 mg hard capsules
2. Qualitative and quantitative composition
Tafinlar 50 mg hard capsules
Each hard capsule contains dabrafenib mesilate equivalent to 50 mg of dabrafenib.
Tafinlar 75 mg hard capsules
Each hard capsule contains dabrafenib mesilate equivalent to 75 mg of dabrafenib.
For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.
3. Pharmaceutical form
Hard capsule (capsule).
Tafinlar 50 mg hard capsules
Opaque dark red capsules, approximately 18 mm long, with capsule shell imprinted with 'GS TEW' and '50 mg'.
Tafinlar 75 mg hard capsules
Opaque dark pink capsules, approximately 19 mm long, with capsule shell imprinted with 'GS LHF' and '75 mg'.
4. Clinical particulars
4.1 Therapeutic indications
Dabrafenib as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation (see sections 4.4 and 5.1).
4.2 Posology and method of administration
Treatment with dabrafenib should be initiated and supervised by a qualified physician experienced in the use of anticancer medicinal products.
Before taking dabrafenib, patients must have confirmation of tumour BRAF V600 mutation using a validated test.
The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib have not been established in patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma therefore dabrafenib should not be used in patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma (see sections 4.4 and 5.1).
Posology
The recommended dose of dabrafenib, either used as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib, is 150 mg (two 75 mg capsules) twice daily (corresponding to a total daily dose of 300 mg). The recommended dose of trametinib, when used in combination with dabrafenib, is 2 mg once daily (QD).
Duration of treatment
Treatment should continue until the patient no longer derives benefit or the development of unacceptable toxicity (see Table 2).
Missed doses
If a dose of dabrafenib is missed, it should not be taken if it is less than 6 hours until the next dose.
If a dose of trametinib is missed, when dabrafenib is given in combination with trametinib, only take the dose of trametinib if it is more than 12 hours until the next scheduled dose.
Dose modification
Two dabrafenib capsule strengths, 50 mg and 75 mg, are available to effectively manage dose modification requirements.
The management of adverse reactions may require treatment interruption, dose reduction, or treatment discontinuation (see Tables 1 and 2).
Dose modifications or interruptions are not recommended for adverse reactions of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) or new primary melanoma (see section 4.4).
Therapy should be interrupted if the patient's temperature is ≥ 38.5°C. Patients should be evaluated for signs and symptoms of infection (see section 4.4).
No dose modifications are required for uveitis as long as effective local therapies can control ocular inflammation. If uveitis does not respond to local ocular therapy, withhold dabrafenib until resolution of ocular inflammation and then restart dabrafenib reduced by one dose level (see section 4.4).
Recommended dose level reductions and recommendations for dose modifications are provided in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
Table 1: Recommended dose level reductions

Dose level

Dabrafenib dose

Used as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib

Trametinib dose*

Only when used in combination with dabrafenib

Starting dose

150 mg BID

2 mg QD

1st dose reduction

100 mg BID

1.5 mg QD

2nd dose reduction

75 mg BID

1 mg QD

3rd dose reduction (combination only)

50 mg BID

1 mg QD

Dose adjustment for dabrafenib below 50 mg BID is not recommended, whether used as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib. Dose adjustment for trametinib below 1 mg QD is not recommended, when used in combination with dabrafenib.

*Please refer to the trametinib SmPC, Posology and method of administration, for dosing instructions for treatment with trametinib monotherapy
Table 2: Dose modification schedule based on the grade of any Adverse Events (AE)

Grade (CTC-AE)*

Recommended dabrafenib dose modifications

Used as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib

Grade 1 or Grade 2 (Tolerable)

Continue treatment and monitor as clinically indicated.

Grade 2 (Intolerable) or Grade 3

Interrupt therapy until toxicity is grade 0-1 and reduce by one dose level when resuming therapy.

Grade 4

Discontinue permanently, or interrupt therapy until grade 0-1 and reduce by one dose level when resuming therapy.

* The intensity of clinical adverse events graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) v4.0
When an individual's adverse reactions are under effective management, dose re-escalation following the same dosing steps as de-escalation may be considered. The dabrafenib dose should not exceed 150 mg twice daily.
If treatment related toxicities occur when dabrafenib is used in combination with trametinib, then both treatments should be simultaneously dose reduced, interrupted or discontinued. Exceptions where dose modifications are necessary for only one of the two treatments are detailed below for pyrexia, uveitis, RAS mutation positive non-cutaneous malignancies and QT prolongation (primarily related to dabrafenib), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED) and interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis (primarily related to trametinib).
Dose modification exceptions (where only one of the two therapies is dose reduced) for selected adverse reactions
Pyrexia
When dabrafenib is used alone and in combination with trametinib, therapy with dabrafenib should be interrupted if the patient's temperature is ≥ 38.5oC (please refer to Table 2 for dose modification guidance). Trametinib should be continued at the same dose. Treatment with anti-pyretics such as ibuprofen or acetaminophen/paracetamol should be initiated. The use of oral corticosteroids should be considered in those instances in which anti-pyretics are insufficient. Patients should be evaluated for signs and symptoms of infection and if necessary treated in line with local practice (see section 4.4).
Upon resolution of pyrexia dabrafenib should be restarted with appropriate anti-pyretic prophylaxis, either 1) at the same dose level, or, 2) reduced by one dose level if the pyrexia is recurrent and/or was accompanied by other severe symptoms including dehydration, hypotension or renal failure.
Uveitis
No dose modifications are required for uveitis as long as effective local therapies can control ocular inflammation. If uveitis does not respond to local ocular therapy, dabrafenib should be withheld until resolution of ocular inflammation and then dabrafenib should be restarted reduced by one dose level. No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib (see section 4.4).
RAS mutation positive non-cutaneous malignancies
The benefits and risks should be considered before continuing treatment with dabrafenib in patients with a non-cutaneous malignancy that has a RAS mutation. No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib.
QT prolongation
If during treatment the QTc exceeds 500 msec, dabrafenib treatment should be temporarily interrupted, electrolyte abnormalities (including magnesium) should be corrected, and cardiac risk factors for QT prolongation (e.g. congestive heart failure, bradyarrhythmias) should be controlled. Re-initiation of treatment should occur once the QTc decreases below 500 msec and at a lower dose. Permanent discontinuation of dabrafenib treatment is recommended if the QTc increase meets values of both > 500 msec and > 60 msec change from pre-treatment values. No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction/Left ventricular dysfunction
If dabrafenib is being used in combination with trametinib and absolute decrease of > 10% in LVEF compared to baseline and the ejection fraction is below the institution's lower limit of normal (LLN), please refer to the trametinib SmPC (see section 4.2) for dose modification instructions for trametinib. No dose modification of dabrafenib is required when taken in combination with trametinib.
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and Retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED)
If patients report new visual disturbances such as diminished central vision, blurry vision, or loss of vision at any time while on combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib, please refer to the trametinib SmPC (see section 4.2) for dose modification instructions for trametinib. No dose modification of dabrafenib is required when taken in combination with trametinib for confirmed cases of RVO or RPED.
Interstitial lung disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis
In patients treated with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib with suspected ILD or pneumonitis, including patients presenting with new or progressive pulmonary symptoms and findings including cough, dyspnea, hypoxia, pleural effusion, or infiltrates, pending clinical investigations, please refer to the trametinib SmPC (see section 4.2) for dose modification instructions for trametinib. No dose modification of dabrafenib is required when taken in combination with trametinib for cases of ILD or pneumonitis.
Non-Caucasian patients
The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib in non-Caucasian patients have not been established. No data are available.
Elderly
No adjustment of the initial dose is required in patients > 65 years of age.
Renal impairment
No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. There are no clinical data in subjects with severe renal impairment and the potential need for dose adjustment cannot be determined (see section 5.2). Dabrafenib should be used with caution in patients with severe renal impairment when administered as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib.
Hepatic impairment
No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild hepatic impairment. There are no clinical data in subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment and the potential need for dose adjustment cannot be determined (see section 5.2). Hepatic metabolism and biliary secretion are the primary routes of elimination of dabrafenib and its metabolites and patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment may have increased exposure. Dabrafenib should be used with caution in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment when administered as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib.
Paediatric population
The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib have not yet been established in children and adolescents (< 18 years). No clinical data are available. Studies in juvenile animals have shown adverse effects of dabrafenib which had not been observed in adult animals (see section 5.3).
Method of administration
The dabrafenib capsules are to be swallowed whole with water. The capsules should not be chewed or opened and should not be mixed with food or liquids due to chemical instability of dabrafenib.
It is recommended that the doses of dabrafenib be taken at similar times every day, leaving an interval of approximately 12 hours between doses. When dabrafenib and trametinib are taken in combination, the once-daily dose of trametinib should be taken at the same time each day with either the morning dose or the evening dose of dabrafenib.
Dabrafenib should be taken at least one hour before, or at least 2 hours after a meal.
If a patient vomits after taking dabrafenib, the patient should not retake the dose and should take the next scheduled dose.
Please refer to trametinib SmPC for information on method of administration when given in combination with dabrafenib.
4.3 Contraindications
Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.
4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use
When dabrafenib is given in combination with trametinib, the SmPC of trametinib must be consulted prior to intiation of combination treatment. For additional information on warnings and precautions associated with trametinib treatment, please refer to the trametinib SmPC.
BRAF V600 testing
The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib have not been established in patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma therefore dabrafenib should not be used in patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma (see sections 4.2 and 5.1).
Dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in patients who have progressed on a BRAF inhibitor
There are limited data in patients taking the combination of dabrafenib with trametinib who have progressed on a prior BRAF inhibitor. These data show that the efficacy of the combination will be lower in these patients (see section 5.1). Therefore, other treatment options should be considered before treatment with the combination in this prior BRAF inhibitor treated population. The sequencing of treatments following progression on a BRAF inhibitor therapy has not been established.
Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib in patients with brain metastases
The safety and efficacy of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib has not been evaluated in patients with a BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma which has metastasised to the brain.
New Malignancies
New malignancies, cutaneous and non-cutaneous, can occur when dabrafenib is used as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib.
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cuSCC)
Cases of cuSCC (including keratoacanthoma) have been reported in patients treated with dabrafenib alone and in combination with trametinib (see section 4.8). In the phase III study MEK115306, cuSCC occurred in 3% (6/209) of patients receiving trametinib in combination with dabrafenib and 10% (22/211) of patients receiving dabrafenib as a single agent. In the phase III study MEK116513, cuSCC occurred in 1% (5/350) of patients receiving trametinib in combination with dabrafenib and 18% (63/349) of patients receiving vemurafenib as a single agent. The median time to diagnosis of the first occurrence of cuSCC in study MEK115306 was 223 days (range 56 to 510 days) in the combination therapy arm and 60 days (range 9 to 653 days) in the dabrafenib monotherapy arm.
It is recommended that skin examination be performed prior to initiation of therapy with dabrafenib and monthly throughout treatment and for up to six months after treatment for cuSCC. Monitoring should continue for 6 months following discontinuation of dabrafenib or until initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy.
Cases of cuSCC should be managed by dermatological excision and dabrafenib treatment or, if taken in combination, dabrafenib and trametinib should be continued without any dose adjustment. Patients should be instructed to immediately inform their physician if new lesions develop.
New primary melanoma
New primary melanomas have been reported in clinical trials in patients treated with dabrafenib. These cases were identified within the first 5 months of dabrafenib as monotherapy. Cases of new primary melanoma can be managed with excision and do not require treatment modification. Monitoring for skin lesions should occur as described for cuSCC.
Non-cutaneous secondary/recurrent malignancy
In vitro experiments have demonstrated paradoxical activation of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) signalling in BRAF wild type cells with RAS mutations when exposed to BRAF inhibitors. This may lead to increased risk of non-cutaneous malignancies with dabrafenib exposure (see section 4.8) when RAS mutations are present. RAS-associated malignancies have been reported in clinical trials, both with another BRAF inhibitor (Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and non-cutaneous SCC of the head and neck) as well as with dabrafenib monotherapy (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, bile duct adenocarcinoma) and with dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor, trametinib (colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer).
Prior to initiation of treatment patients should undergo a head and neck examination with minimally visual inspection of oral mucosa and lymph node palpation, as well as chest/abdomen Computerised Tomography (CT) scan. During treatment patients should be monitored as clinically appropriate which may include a head and neck examination every 3 months and a chest/abdomen CT scan every 6 months. Anal examinations and pelvic examinations (for women) are recommended before and at the end of treatment or when considered clinically indicated. Complete blood cell counts should be performed as clinically indicated.
Carefully consider benefits and risks before administering dabrafenib to patients with a prior or concurrent cancer associated with RAS mutations. No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib.
Following discontinuation of dabrafenib, monitoring for non-cutaneous secondary/recurrent malignancies should continue for up to 6 months or until initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy. Abnormal findings should be managed according to clinical practices.
Haemorrhage
Haemorrhagic events, including major haemorrhagic and fatal haemorrhages, have occurred in patients taking the combination of dabrafenib with trametinib (see section 4.8). Please refer to the trametinib SmPC for additional information (see section 4.4).
Visual impairment
In clincial trials ophthalmologic reactions, including uveitis, iridocyclitis and iritis/or have been reported in patients treated with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib. Patients should be routinely monitored for visual signs and symptoms (such as, change in vision, photophobia and eye pain) while on therapy.
No dose modifications are required as long as effective local therapies can control ocular inflammation. If uveitis does not respond to local ocular therapy, withhold dabrafenib until resolution of ocular inflammation and then restart dabrafenib reduced by one dose level. No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib following diagnosis of uveitis.
RPED and RVO may occur with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC (see section 4.4). No dose modification of dabrafenib is required when taken in combination with trametinib following diagnosis of RVO or RPED.
Pyrexia
Fever has been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib (see section 4.8). In 1 % of patients in clinical trials with dabrafenib monotherapy, serious non-infectious febrile events were identified defined as fever accompanied by severe rigors, dehydration, hypotension and/or acute renal insufficiency of pre-renal origin in subjects with normal baseline renal function (see section 4.8). The onset of these serious non-infectious febrile events was typically within the first month of dabrafenib as monotherapy. Patients with serious non-infectious febrile events responded well to dose interruption and/or dose reduction and supportive care.
The incidence and severity of pyrexia are increased with combination therapy. In the combination therapy arm of study MEK115306 pyrexia was reported in 57% (119/209) of patients with 7% Grade 3, as compared to the dabrafenib monotherapy arm with 33% (69/211) of patients reporting pyrexia, 2% Grade 3.
For patients who received dabrafenib in combination with trametinib and developed pyrexia, approximately half of the first occurrences of pyrexia happened within the first month of therapy and approximately one-third of the patients had 3 or more events.
Therapy with dabrafenib should be interrupted if the patient's temperature is ≥ 38.5°C (please refer to Table 2 for dose modification guidance). Patients should be evaluated for signs and symptoms of infection. Dabrafenib can be restarted once the fever resolves with appropriate prophylaxis using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicinal products or paracetamol. The use of oral corticosteroids should be considered in those instances in which anti-pyretics are insufficient. If fever is associated with other severe signs or symptoms, dabrafenib should be restarted at a reduced dose once fever resolves and as clinically appropriate (see section 4.2). No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib.
LVEF reduction/Left ventricular dysfunction
Dabrafenib in combination with trametinib has been reported to decrease LVEF (see section 4.8). Please refer to the trametinib SmPC for additional information (see section 4.4). No dose modification of dabrafenib is required when taken in combination with trametinib.
Renal failure
Renal failure has been identified in < 1 % of patients treated with dabrafenib alone and in ≤1 % of patients treated with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Observed cases were generally associated with pyrexia and dehydration and responded well to dose interruption and general supportive measures. Granulomatous nephritis has been reported (see section 4.8). Patients should be routinely monitored for serum creatinine while on therapy. If creatinine increases, dabrafenib may need to be interrupted as clinically appropriate. Dabrafenib has not been studied in patients with renal insufficiency (defined as creatinine > 1.5 x ULN) therefore caution should be used in this setting (see section 5.2).
Hepatic Events
Hepatic adverse events have been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib (see section 4.8). It is recommended that patients receiving treatment with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib have liver function monitored every four weeks for 6 months after treatment initiation with trametinib. Liver monitoring may be continued thereafter as clinically indicated. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC for additional information.
Hypertension
Elevations in blood pressure have been reported in association with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, in patients with or without pre-existing hypertension (see section 4.8). Please refer to the trametinib SmPC for additional information.
Interstitial lung disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis
Cases of pneumonitis or ILD have been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC section 4.4 for additional information. If dabrafenib is being used in combination with trametinib then therapy with dabrafenib may be continued at the same dose.
Rash
Rash has been observed in about 25% of patients in clincial studies when dabrafenib is used in combination with trametinib. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC section 4.4 for additional information.
Rhabdomyolysi
Rhabdomyolysis has been reported in patients taking dabrafenib in combination with trametinib (see section 4.8). Please refer to the trametinib SmPC section 4.4 for additional information.
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis has been reported in < 1 % of dabrafenib-treated subjects as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib. One of the events occurred on the first day of dabrafenib dosing and recurred following re-challenge at a reduced dose. Unexplained abdominal pain should be promptly investigated to include measurement of serum amylase and lipase. Patients should be closely monitored when re-starting dabrafenib after an episode of pancreatitis.
QT prolongation
Worst-case QTc prolongation of > 60 millisecond (msec) was observed in 3 % of dabrafenib-treated subjects (One > 500 msec in the integrated safety population). In the phase III study MEK115306 no patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib had worst-case QTcB prolongation to >500 msec; QTcB was increased more than 60 msec from baseline in 1 % (3/209) of patients. In the phase III study MEK116513 four patients (1%) treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib had a QTcB Grade 3 increase (> 500 msec). Two of these patients had a QTcB Grade 3 increase (> 500 msec) that was also an increase > 60 msec from Baseline.
Treatment with dabrafenib is not recommended in patients with uncorrectable electrolyte abnormalities (including magnesium), long QT syndrome or who are taking medicinal products known to prolong the QT interval.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrolytes (including magnesium) must be monitored in all patients before treatment with dabrafenib, after one month of treatment and after dose modification. Further monitoring is recommended in particular in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment monthly during the first 3 months of treatment followed by every 3 months thereafter or more often as clinically indicated. Initiation of treatment with dabrafenib is not recommended in patients with QTc > 500 msec. If during treatment the QTc exceeds 500 msec, dabrafenib treatment should be temporarily interrupted, electrolyte abnormalities (including magnesium) should be corrected, and cardiac risk factors for QT prolongation (e.g. congestive heart failure, bradyarrhythmias) should be controlled. Re-initiation of treatment should occur once the QTc decreases below 500 msec and at a lower dose as described in Table 2. Permanent discontinuation of dabrafenib treatment is recommended if the QTc increase meets values of both > 500 msec and > 60 msec change from pre-treatment values (see section 4.2). No dose modification of trametinib is required when taken in combination with dabrafenib.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/Pulmonary embolism (PE)
Pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis can occur when dabrafenib is used in combination with trametinib. If patients develop symptoms of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis such as shortness of breath, chest pain, or arm or leg swelling, they should immediately seek medical care. Permanently discontinue trametinib and dabrafenib for life-threatening pulmonary embolism.
Effects of other substances on dabrafenib
Dabrafenib is a substrate of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. Potent inducers of these enzymes should be avoided when possible as these agents may decrease the efficacy of dabrafenib (see section 4.5).
Agents that increase gastric pH might decrease the bioavailability of dabrafenib and should be avoided when possible (see section 4.5).
Effects of dabrafenib on other substances
Dabrafenib is an inducer of metabolising enzymes which may lead to loss of efficacy of many commonly used medicinal products (see examples in section 4.5). A drug utilisation review (DUR) is therefore essential when initiating dabrafenib treatment. Concomitant use of dabrafenib with medicinal products that are sensitive substrates of certain metabolising enzymes or transporters (see section 4.5) should generally be avoided if monitoring for efficacy and dose adjustment is not possible.
Concomitant administration of dabrafenib with warfarin results in decreased warfarin exposure. Caution should be exercised and additional International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring is recommended when dabrafenib is used concomitantly with warfarin and at discontinuation of dabrafenib (see section 4.5).
Concomitant administration of dabrafenib with digoxin may result in decreased digoxin exposure. Caution should be exercised and additional monitoring of digoxin is recommended when digoxin (a transporter substrate) is used concomitantly with dabrafenib and at discontinuation of dabrafenib (see section 4.5).
4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
Effect of other medicinal products on dabrafenib
Dabrafenib is a substrate for the metabolising enzymes CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, while the active metabolites hydroxy-dabrafenib and desmethyl-dabrafenib are CYP3A4 substrates. Medicinal products that are strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP2C8 or CYP3A4 are therefore likely to increase or decrease, respectively, dabrafenib concentrations. Alternative agents should be considered during administration with dabrafenib when possible. Use caution if strong inhibitors (e.g. ketoconazole, gemfibrozil, nefazodone, clarithromycin, ritonavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, atazanavir) are coadministered with dabrafenib. Avoid coadministration of dabrafenib with potent inducers (e.g. rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum)) of CYP2C8 or CYP3A4.
Administration of ketoconazole (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) 400 mg once daily, with dabrafenib 75 mg twice daily, resulted in a 71 % increase in dabrafenib AUC and a 33 % increase in dabrafenib Cmax relative to administration of dabrafenib 75 mg twice daily alone. Co-administration resulted in increases in hydroxy- and desmethyl-dabrafenib AUC (increases of 82 % and 68 %, respectively). A decrease of 16 % in AUC was noted for carboxy-dabrafenib.
Administration of gemfibrozil (a CYP2C8 inhibitor) 600 mg twice daily, with dabrafenib 75 mg twice daily, resulted in a 47 % increase in dabrafenib AUC but did not alter dabrafenib Cmax relative to administration of dabrafenib 75 mg twice daily alone. Gemfibrozil had no clinically relevant effect on the systemic exposure to dabrafenib metabolites (≤ 13 %).
Dabrafenib solubility is pH-dependent with decreased solubility at higher pH. Medicinal products such as proton pump inhibitors that inhibit gastric acid secretion to elevate gastric pH may decrease the solubility of dabrafenib and reduce its bioavailability. No clinical study has been conducted to evaluate the effect of pH on dabrafenib pharmacokinetics. Due to the theoretical risk that pH-elevating agents may decrease oral bioavailability and exposure to dabrafenib, these medicinal products that increase gastric pH should, if possible, be avoided during treatment with dabrafenib.
Effect of dabrafenib on other medicinal products
Dabrafenib is an enzyme inducer and increases the synthesis of drug-metabolising enzymes including CYP3A4, CYP2Cs and CYP2B6 and may increase the synthesis of transporters. This results in reduced plasma levels of medicinal products metabolised by these enzymes, and may affect some transported medicinal products. The reduction in plasma concentrations can lead to lost or reduced clinical effect of these medicinal products. There is also a risk of increased formation of active metabolites of these medicinal products. Enzymes that may be induced include CYP3A in the liver and gut, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and UGTs (glucuronide conjugating enzymes). The transport protein Pgp may also be induced as well as other transporters, e g MRP-2, BCRP and OATP1B1/1B3.
In vitro, dabrafenib produced dose-dependent increases in CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. In a clinical drug interaction study, Cmax and AUC of oral midazolam (a CYP3A4 substrate) decreased by 61 % and 74 %, respectively with co-administration of repeat dose dabrafenib using a formulation with lower bioavailability than dabrafenib formulation.
Administration of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and warfarin resulted in a decrease in AUC of S- and R- warfarin and of 37 % and 33 % compared to administration of warfarin alone. Cmax of S- and R-warfarin increased 18 % and 19 %.
Interactions with many medicinal products eliminated through metabolism or active transport is expected. If their therapeutic effect is of large importance to the patient, and dose adjustments are not easily performed based on monitoring of efficacy or plasma concentrations, these medicinal products are to be avoided or used with caution. The risk for liver injury after paracetamol administration is suspected to be higher in patients concomitantly treated with enzyme inducers.
The number of affected medicinal products is expected to be large; although the magnitude of the interaction will vary. Groups of medicinal products that can be affected include, but are not limited to:
• Analgesics (e.g. fentanyl, methadone)
• Antibiotics (e.g. clarithromycin, doxycycline)
• Anticancer agents (e.g. cabazitaxel)
• Anticoagulants (e.g. acenocoumarol, warfarin (see section 4.4))
• Antiepileptic (e.g. carbamazepine, phenytoin, primidone, valproic acid)
• Antipsychotics (e.g. haloperidol)
• Calcium channel blockers (e.g. diltiazem, felodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, verapamil)
• Cardiac glycosides (e.g. digoxin, see section 4.4)
• Corticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone, methylprednisolone)
• HIV antivirals (e.g. amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, delavirdine, efavirenz, fosamprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir, tipranavir)
• Hormonal contraceptives (see section 4.6)
• Hypnotics (e.g. diazepam, midazolam, zolpidem)
• Immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus)
• Statins metabolized by CYP3A4 (e.g. atorvastatin, simvastatin
Onset of induction is likely to occur after 3 days of repeat dosing with dabrafenib. Upon discontinuation of dabrafenib offset of induction is gradual, concentrations of sensitive CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, UDP glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) and transporter substrates may increase and patients should be monitored for toxicity and dosage of these agents may need to be adjusted.
In vitro, dabrafenib is a mechanism based inhibitor of CYP3A4. Therefore, transient inhibition of CYP3A4 may be observed during the first few days of treatment.
Effects of dabrafenib on substance transport systems
Dabrafenib is an in vitro inhibitor of of human organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 (OATP1B1) and OATP1B3 and clinical relevance can not be excluded. Therefore caution is recommended at co-administration of dabrafenib and OATB1B1 or OATP1B3 substrates such as statins.Although dabrafenib and its metabolites, hydroxy-dabrafenib, carboxy-dabrafenib and desmethyl-dabrafenib, were inhibitors of humanorganic anion transporter (OAT) 1 and OAT3 in vitro, the risk of a drug-drug interaction is minimal based on clinical exposure. Dabrafenib and desmethyl-dabrafenib were also shown to be moderate inhibitors of human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP); however, based on clinical exposure, the risk of a drug-drug interaction is minimal.
Combination with trametinib
Co-administration of repeat dosing of trametinib 2 mg QD and dabrafenib 150 mg BID resulted in no clinically meaningful changes in trametinib or dabrafenib Cmax and AUC with increases of 16 and 23 %, respectively, in dabrafenib Cmax and AUC. A small decrease in trametinib bioavailability, corresponding to a decrease in AUC of 12 %, was estimated when trametinib is administered in combination with dabrafenib, a CYP3A4 inducer, using a population PK analysis.
When dabrafenib is used in combination with trametinib refer to the guidance for medicinal product interactions found in sections 4.4 and 4.5 of dabrafenib and trametinib SmPC.
Effect of food on dabrafenib
Patients should take dabrafenib as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib at least one hour prior to or two hours after a meal due to the effect of food on dabrafenib absorption (see section 5.2).
Paediatric population
Interaction studies have only been performed in adults.
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Women of chilbearing potential/Contraception in females
Women of childbearing potential must use effective methods of contraception during therapy and for 4 weeks following discontinuation of dabrafenib and 4 months following the last dose of trametinib when given in combination with dabrafenib. Dabrafenib may decrease the efficacy of hormonal contraceptives and an alternate method of contraception, such as barrier methods, should be used (see section 4.5).
Pregnancy
There are no data from the use of dabrafenib in pregnant women. Animal studies have shown reproductive toxicity and embryofoetal developmental toxicities, including teratogenic effects (see section 5.3). Dabrafenib should not be administered to pregnant women unless the potential benefit to the mother outweighs the possible risk to the foetus. If the patient becomes pregnant while taking dabrafenib, the patient should be informed of the potential hazard to the foetus. Please see trametinib SmPC ( see section 4.6) when used in combination with trametinib.
Breast-feeding
It is not known whether dabrafenib is excreted in human milk. Because many medicinal products are excreted in human milk, a risk to the breast-feeding child cannot be excluded. A decision should be made whether to discontinue breastfeeding or discontinue dabrafenib, taking into account the benefit of breastfeeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman.
Fertility
There are no data in humans for dabrafenib as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib. Dabrafenib may impair male and female fertility as adverse effects on male and female reproductive organs have been seen in animals (see section 5.3). Male patients taking dabrafenib as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib should be informed of the potential risk for impaired spermatogenesis, which may be irreversible.
4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines
Dabrafenib has minor influence on the ability to drive and use machines. The clinical status of the patient and the adverse reaction profile of dabrafenib should be borne in mind when considering the patient's ability to perform tasks that require judgement, motor or cognitive skills. Patients should be made aware of the potential for fatigue and eye problems to affect these activities.
4.8 Undesirable effects
Summary of the safety profile
The dabrafenib monotherapy safety profile is based on data from five clinical studies and included 578 patients with melanoma. The most frequently occurring adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (≥ 15 %) reported with dabrafenib were hyperkeratosis, headache, pyrexia, arthralgia, fatigue, nausea, papilloma, alopecia, rash and vomiting.
The safety of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib has been evaluated in 2 Phase III studies, MEK115306 and MEK116513, where an analysis of the safety of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib has been conducted in 209 and 350 patients, respectively, with BRAF V600 mutation positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma receiving dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD) combination therapy (see section 5.1 combination therapy). The most common adverse reactions (≥ 20 %) for dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy include pyrexia, fatigue, nausea, headache, chills, diarrhoea, rash, arthralgia, hypertension, vomiting and cough.
Tabulated summary of adverse reactions
ADRs which were reported are listed below by MedDRA body system organ class and by frequency. The following convention has been utilised for the classification of frequency:
Very common
Common
Uncommon
Rare
Not known
 ≥ 1/10
≥ 1/100 to < 1/10
≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100
≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000
(cannot be estimated from the available data)
Dabrafenib monotherapy
Table 3: Adverse reactions reported in melanoma trias

System Organ Class

Frequency (all grades)

Adverse Reactions

Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)

Very common

Papilloma

Common

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Common

Seborrhoeic keratosis

Common

Acrochordon (skin tags)

Common

Basal cell carcinoma

Uncommon

New primary melanoma

Immune system disorders

Uncommon

Hypersensitivity

Uncommon

Panniculitis

Metabolism and nutrition disorders

Very common

Decreased appetite

Common

Hypophosphataemia

Common

Hyperglycaemia

Nervous system disorders

Very common

Headache

Eye disorders

Uncommon

Uveitis

Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Very common

Cough

Gastrointestinal disorders

Very common

Nausea

Very common

Vomiting

Very common

Diarrhoea

Common

Constipation

Uncommon

Pancreatitis

Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Very common

Hyperkeratosis

Very common

Alopecia

Very common

Rash

Very common

Palmar –plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome

Common

Dry skin

Common

Pruritus

Common

Actinic keratosis

Common

Skin lesion

Common

Erythema

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Very common

Arthralgia

Very common

Myalgia

Very common

Pain in extremity

Renal and urinary disorders

Uncommon

Renal failure, acute renal failure

Uncommon

Nephritis

General disorders and administration site conditions

Very common

Pyrexia

Very common

Fatigue

Very common

Chills

Very common

Asthenia

Common

Influenza-like illness

Investigations

Common

LVEF decrease

Uncommon

QT prolongation

Dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy
Table 4: Adverse reactions occurring in the two randomised phase III combination studies MEK115306 (n = 209) and MEK116513a (n=350)

System Organ Class

Frequency (all grades)

Adverse Reactions

Infections and Infestations

Very Common

Urinary tract infection

Nasopharyngitis

Common

Cellulitis

Folliculitis

Paronychia

Rash pustular

Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Common

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomab

Papillomac

Seborrhoeic keratosis

Acrochordon (skin tags)

Uncommon

New primary melanoma

Blood and lymphatic system disorders

Very common

Neutropenia

Common

Anaemia

Thrombocytopenia

Leukopenia

Immune system disorders

Uncommon

Drug Hypersensitivity

Metabolism and nutrition disorders

Very common

Decreased appetite

Common

Dehydration

Hyponatraemia

Hypophosphataemia

Hyperglycaemia

Nervous system disorders

Very common

Headache

Dizziness

Eye disorders

Common

Vision blurred

Visual impairment

Uncommon

Chorioretinopathy

Uveitis

Retinal detachment

Periorbital oedema

Cardiac disorder

Common

Ejection fraction decreased

Vascular disorders

Very common

Hypertension

Haemorrhaged

Common

Hypotension

Uncommon

Lymphoedemaa

Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Very Common

Cough

Common

Dyspnoea

Uncommon

Pneumonitis

Gastrointestinal disorders

Very common

Abdominal pain

Constipation

Diarrhoea

Nausea

Vomiting

Common

Dry mouth

Stomatitis

Uncommon

Pancreatitis

Hepatobiliary disorder

Very Common

Alanine aminotransferase increased

Aspartate aminotransferase increased

Common

Blood alkaline phosphatase increased

Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased

Skin and subcutaneous disorders

Very common

Dry skin

Pruritus

Rash

Dermatitis acneiform

Common

Erythema

Actinic keratosis

Night sweats

Hyperkeratosis

Alopecia

Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome

Skin lesion

Hyperhidrosis

Panniculitis

Skin Fissures

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Very common

Arthralgia

Myalgia

Pain in extremity

Common

Muscle spasmsa

Blood creatine phosphokinase increased

Renal and urinary disorders

Uncommon

Renal failurea

Nephritis

General disorders and administration site conditions

Very Common

Fatigue

Chills

Asthenia

Oedema peripheral

Pyrexia

Common

Mucosal inflammation

Influenza-like illness

Face oedema

a The safety profile from MEK116513 is generally similar to that of MEK115306 with the following exceptions: 1) the following adverse reactions have a higher frequency category as compared to MEK115306: Muscle spasm (Very common); Renal failure and Lymhoedema (Common); Acute renal failure (Uncommon); 2) the following adverse reactions have occurred in MEK116513 but not in MEK115306: cardiac failure, left ventricular dysfunction, interstitial lung disease, rhabdomyolysis (Uncommon).
b cu SCC: SCC of the skin, SCC in situ (Bowen's disease) and keratoacanthoma
c Papilloma, skin papilloma
d Bleeding from various sites, including intracranial bleeding and fatal bleeding
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme at: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard.
Description of selected adverse reactions
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (including those classified as keratoacanthoma or mixed keratoacanthoma subtype) occurred in 9 % of patients treated with dabrafenib monotherapy in the integrated safety population and 3 % of patients treated with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in MEK115306. With dabrafenib monotherapy, approximately 70 % of events occurred within the first 12 weeks of treatment with a median time to onset of 8 weeks. In patients who received the combination dose of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, events occurred later with the median time to onset of 22 weeks. Ninety-six percent of patients on dabrafenib monotherapy in the integrated safety population and all patients on combination therapy in the Phase III studies who developed cuSCC continued on treatment without dose modification.
New primary melanoma
New primary melanomas have been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib. Cases were managed with excision and did not require treatment modification (see section 4.4).
Non-cutaneous malignancy
Activation of MAP-kinase signalling in BRAF wild type cells which are exposed to BRAF inhibitors may lead to increased risk of non-cutaneous malignancies, including those with RAS mutations (see section 4.4). In clinical trials non-cutaneous malignancies were reported in 1 % (6/586) of patients with dabrafenib monotherapy, and 1 % (3/209) of patients in study MEK115306 and < 1 % (3/350) of patients in study MEK116513 with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Cases of RAS-driven malignancies have been seen with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib. Patients should be monitored as clinically appropriate.
Haemorrhage
Haemorrhagic events, including major haemorrhagic events and fatal haemorrhages have occurred in patients taking dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC.
QT prolongation
One patient in the dabrafenib monotherapy integrated safety population experienced a QTcB > 500 ms and only 3 % experienced worst-case QTc prolongation of > 60 msec. In patients receiving dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, no patients in one Phase III study and 4 patients (1 %) in a second Phase III study had worst-case QTcB prolongation to > 500 msec; 2 of the 4 patients also had an increase > 60 msec from Baseline.
LVEF Reduction/Left Ventricular Dysfunction
In the integrated safety population decreased LVEF has been reported in 1 % of patients treated with dabrafenib as monotherapy, and 6 to 8 % of patients treated with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in two Phase III clinical trials, with most cases being asymptomatic and reversible. Patients with LVEF lower than the institutional lower limit of normal were not included in clinical trials with dabrafenib. Dabrafenib in combination with trametinib should be used with caution in patients with conditions that could impair left ventricular function.
Pyrexia
Fever has been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib; the incidence and severity of pyrexia are increased with the combination therapy (see section 4.4). For patients who received dabrafenib in combination with trametinib and developed pyrexia, approximately half of the first occurrences of pyrexia happened within the first month of therapy and approximately one-third of the patients had 3 or more events. In 1 % of patients receiving dabrafenib as monotherapy in the integrated safety population in clinical trials, serious non-infectious febrile events were identified as fever accompanied by severe rigors, dehydration, hypotension and/or acute renal insufficiency or pre-renal origin in subjects with normal baseline renal function. The onset of these serious non-infectious febrile events was typically within the first month of therapy. Patients with serious non-infectious febrile events responded well to dose interruption and/or dose reduction and supportive care (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Hepatic Events
Hepatic adverse events have been reported in clinical trials with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. Please refer to the trametinib SmPC.
Hypertension
Elevations in blood pressure have been reported in association with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, in patients with or without pre-existing hypertension. Blood pressure should be measured at baseline and monitored during treatment, with control of hypertension by standard therapy asappropriate.
Arthralgia
Arthralgia was reported very commonly in clinical trials with dabrafenib as monotherapy and in combination with trametinib (approximately 25 %) although these were mainly grade 1 and 2 in severity with Grade 3 occurring uncommonly (< 1 %) and no Grade 4 occurrences being reported.
Hypophosphataemia
Hypophosphataemia has been reported commonly in the integrated safety population in clinical trials with dabrafenib monotherapy (7 %) and in combination with trametinib in Phase III trials (3 to 4 %). It should be noted that approximately half of these occurrences with dabrafenib monotherapy (4 %) and ≤ 1 % with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib were Grade 3 in severity.
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis has been reported in dabrafenib monotherapy and in combination with trametinib. Unexplained abdominal pain should be promptly investigated to include measurement of serum amylase and lipase. Patients should be closely monitored when re-starting dabrafenib after an episode of pancreatitis (see section 4.4).
Renal failure
Renal failure due to pyrexia-associated pre-renal azotaemia or granulomatous nephritis was uncommon; however dabrafenib has not been studied in patients with renal insufficiency (defined as creatinine > 1.5 x ULN). Caution should be used in this setting (see section 4.4).
Special populations
Elderly
Of the total number of patients in clinical studies of dabrafenib (N = 578), 22 % were 65 years of age and older, and 6 % were 75 years of age and older. Compared with younger subjects (< 65), more subjects ≥ 65 years old had adverse reactions that led to study drug dose reductions (22 % versus 12 %) or interruptions (39 % versus 27 %). In addition, older patients experienced more serious adverse reactions compared to younger patients (41 % versus 22 %). No overall differences in efficacy were observed between these subjects and younger subjects.
In the phase III studies MEK115306 (n=209) and MEK116513 (n=350) with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, 56 patients (27 %) and 77 patients (22%) respectively were ≥ 65 years of age, 11 patients (5 %) and 21 patients (6%) respectively were ≥ 75 years of age. The proportion of patients experiencing AEs was similar in those aged < 65 years and those aged ≥ 65 years in both studies. Patients ≥ 65 years were more likely to experience SAEs and AEs leading to permanent discontinuation of medicinal product, dose reduction and dose interruption than those < 65 years.
4.9 Overdose
There is no specific treatment for an overdose of dabrafenib. If overdose occurs, the patient should be treated supportively with appropriate monitoring as necessary.
5. Pharmacological properties
5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, protein kinase inhibitor, ATC code: L01XE23
Mechanism of action
Dabrafenib is an inhibitor of RAF kinases. Oncogenic mutations in BRAF lead to constitutive activation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. BRAF mutations have been identified at a high frequency in specific cancers, including approximately 50 % of melanoma. The most commonly observed BRAF mutation is V600E which accounts for approximately 90 % of the BRAF mutations that are seen in melanoma.
Preclinical data generated in biochemical assays demonstrated that dabrafenib inhibits BRAF kinases with activating codon 600 mutations (Table 5).
Table 5: Kinase inhibitory activity of dabrafenib against RAF kinases

Kinase

Inhibitory concentration 50 (nM)

BRAF V600E

0.65

BRAF V600K

0.50

BRAF V600D

1.8

BRAF WT

3.2

CRAF WT

5.0

Dabrafenib demonstrated suppression of a downstream pharmacodynamic biomarker (phosphorylated ERK) and inhibited cell growth of BRAF V600 mutant melanoma cell lines, in vitro and in animal models.

In subjects with BRAF V600 mutation positive melanoma, administration of dabrafenib resulted in inhibition of tumour phosphorylated ERK relative to baseline.
Combination with trametinib
Trametinib is a reversible, highly selective, allosteric inhibitor of mitogen-activated extracellular signal regulated kinase 1 (MEK1) and MEK2 activation and kinase activity. MEK proteins are components of the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) pathway. Thus, trametinib and dabrafenib inhibit two kinases in this pathway, MEK and RAF, and therefore the combination provides concomitant inhibition of the pathway. The combination of dabrafenib with trametinib has shown anti-tumour activity in BRAF V600 mutation positive melanoma cell lines in vitro and delays the emergence of resistance in vivo in BRAF V600 mutation positive melanoma xenografts.
Determination of BRAF mutation status
Before taking dabrafenib or combination with trametinib, patients must have BRAF V600 mutation-positive tumour status confirmed by a validated test. In the Phase II and III clinical trials, screening for eligibility required central testing for BRAF V600 mutation using a BRAF mutation assay conducted on the most recent tumour sample available. Primary tumour or tumour from a metastatic site was tested with an investigational use only assay (IUO). The IUO is an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue. The assay was specifically designed to differentiate between the V600E and V600K mutations. Only subjects with BRAF V600E or V600K mutation positive tumors were eligible for study participation.
Subsequently, all patient samples were re-tested using the bioMerieux (bMx) THxID BRAF validated assay, which has CE marking. The bMx THxID BRAF assay is an allele-specific PCR performed on DNA extracted from FFPE tumour tissue. The assay was designed to detect the BRAF V600E and V600K mutations with high sensitivity (down to 5 % V600E and V600K sequence in a background of wild-type sequence using DNA extracted from FFPE tissue). Non-clinical and clinical studies with retrospective bi-directional Sanger sequencing analyses have shown that the test also detects the less common BRAF V600D mutation and V600E/K601E mutation with lower sensitivity. Of the specimens from the non-clinical and clinical studies (n = 876) that were mutation positive by the THxID BRAF assay and subsequently were sequenced using the reference method, the specificity of the assay was 94 %.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Dabrafenib in combination with trametinib
Treatment naïve patients
The safety and efficacy of the recommended dose of trametinib (2 mg QD) in combination with dabrafenib (150 mg BID) for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation was studied in two Phase III studies and one supportive Phase I/II study.
MEK115306 (COMBI-d)
MEK115306 was a Phase III, randomised, double-blinded study comparing the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib to dabrafenib and placebo in first-line therapy for subjects with unresectable (Stage IIIC) or metastatic (Stage IV) BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive cutaneous melanoma. The primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS), with a key secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS). Subjects were stratified by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (> the upper limit of normal (ULN) versus ≤ ULN) and BRAF mutation (V600E versus V600K).
A total of 423 subjects were randomised 1:1 to either combination (N = 211) or dabrafenib (N = 212). Most subjects were white (> 99 %) and male (53 %), with a median age of 56 years (28 % were ≥ 65 years). The majority of subjects had Stage IVM1c disease (67 %). Most subjects had LDH ≤ULN (65 %), ECOG performance status of 0 (72 %), and visceral disease (73 %) at Baseline. The majority of subjects had a BRAF V600E mutation (85 %). Subjects with brain metastases were not included in the trial.
The final OS analysis (12 January 2015) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS for the combination compared with dabrafenib monotherapy (Figure 1). The 1-year (74 %) and 2-year (51 %) OS estimates for the combination arm were greater than those for dabrafenib monotherapy (68 % and 42 % respectively).
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Overall Survival Curves for Study MEK115306 (ITT Population)


Statistically significant improvements were observed for the primary endpoint of PFS and secondary endpoint of ORR. A longer Duration of Response is also observed (Table 6).
Table 6: Efficacy results for Study MEK115306 (COMBI-d)

Endpoint

Dabrafenib + Trametinib

(N=211)

Dabrafenib + Placebo

(N=212)

Dabrafenib + Trametinib

(N=211)

Dabrafenib + Placebo

(N=212)

Data cut-off date

26 August 2013

12 January 2015

PFSa

Progressive disease or death, n (%)

102 (48)

109 (51)

139 (66)

162 (76)

Median PFS (months)

(95 % CI)

9.3

(7.7, 11.1)

8.8

(5.9, 10.9)

11.0

(8.0, 13.9)

8.8

(5.9, 9.3)

Hazard Ratio

(95 % CI)

0.75

(0.57, 0.99)

0.67

(0.53, 0.84)

P value

0.035

<0.001

ORRb

(95 % CI)

67

(59.9, 73.0)

51

(44.5, 58.4)

69

(61.8,74.8)

53

(46.3, 60.2)

ORR difference

(95 % CI)

15e

(5.9, 24.5)

15e

(6.0, 24.5)

P value

0.0015

0.0014

DoRc (months)

Median

(95 % CI)

9.2d

(7.4, NR)

10.2d

(7.5, NR)

12.9

(9.4,19.5)

10.6

(9.1, 13.8)

a – Progression Free Survival (Investigator assessed)
b – Overall Response Rate = Complete Response + Partial Response
c – Duration of Response
d - At the time of the reporting the majority (≥59%) of investigator-assessed responses were still ongoing
e – ORR difference calculated based on the ORR result not rounde
NR = Not reached
MEK116513 (COMBI-v)
Study MEK116513 was a 2-arm, randomised, open-label, Phase III study comparing dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy with vemurafenib monotherapy in BRAF V600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival with a key secondary endpoint of PFS. Subjects were stratified by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (> the upper limit of normal (ULN) versus ≤ ULN) and BRAF mutation (V600E versus V600K).
A total of 704 subjects were randomised 1:1 to either combination or vemurafenib. Most subjects were white (> 96 %) and male (55 %), with a median age of 55 years (24 % were ≥ 65 years). The majority of subjects had Stage IV M1c disease (61 % overall). Most subjects had LDH ≤ULN (67%), ECOG performance status of 0 (70 %), and visceral disease (78 %) at Baseline. Overall, 54 % of subjects had < 3 disease sites at Baseline. The majority of subjects had BRAF V600E mutation-positive melanoma (89 %). Subjects with brain metastases were not included in the trial.
The updated OS analysis (13 March 2015) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS for the combination compared with vemurafenib monotherapy (Figure 2). The 12-month OS estimate was 72% for combination therapy and 65% for vemurafenib.
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curves Updated OS analysis for Study MEK116513


Statistically significant improvements are observed for the secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. A longer Duration of Response is also observed (Table 7).
Table 7: Efficacy results for Study MEK116513 (COMBI-v)

Endpoint

Dabrafenib + Trametinib

(N=352)

Vemurafenib

(N=352)

PFSa

Progressive disease or death, n (%)

166 (47)

217 (62)

Median PFS (months)

(95 % CI)

11.4

(9.9, 14.9)

7.3

(5.8, 7.8)

Hazard Ratio

(95 % CI)

0.56

(0.46, 0.69)

P value

<0.001

ORRb

(95 % CI)

226 (64)

(59.1, 69.4)

180 (51)

(46.1, 56.8)

ORR difference

(95 % CI)

13

(5.7, 20.2)

P value

0.0005

DoR (months)

Median

(95 % CI)

13.8

(11.0, NR)

7.5

(7.3, 9.3)

Prior BRAF inhibitor therapy
There are limited data in patients taking the combination of dabrafenib with trametinib who have progressed on a prior BRAF inhibitor.
Part B of study BRF113220 (included a cohort of 26 patients that had progressed on a BRAF inhibitor. The trametinib 2 mg QD and dabrafenib 150 mg BID combination demonstrated limited clinical activity in patients who had progressed on a BRAF inhibitor. The Investigator-assessed confirmed response rate was 15 % (95 % CI: 4.4, 34.9) and the median PFS was 3.6 months (95 % CI: 1.9, 5.2). Similar results were seen in the 45 patients who crossed over from dabrafenib monotherapy to the trametinib 2 mg QD and dabrafenib 150 mg BID combination in Part C of this study. In these patients a 13 % (95 CI: 5.0, 27.0) confirmed response rate was observed with a median PFS of 3.6 months (95 % CI: 2, 4).
Dabrafenib monotherapy
The efficacy of dabrafenib in the treatment of adult patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma has been evaluated in 3 studies (BRF113683 [BREAK-3], BRF113929 [BREAK-MB], and BRF113710 [BREAK-2]) including patients with BRAF V600E and/or V600K mutations.
Included in these studies were in total 402 subjects with BRAF V600E and 49 subjects with BRAF V600K mutation. Patients with melanoma driven by BRAF mutations other than V600E were excluded from the confirmatory trial and with respect to patients with the V600K mutation in single arm studies the activity appears lower than in V600E tumours.
No data is available in patients with melanoma harbouring BRAF V600 mutations others than V600E and V600K. Efficacy of dabrafenib in subjects previously treated with a protein kinase inhibitor has not been investigated.
Previously untreated patients (Results from the Phase III study [BREAK-3])The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib were evaluated in a Phase III randomized, open-label study [BREAK 3] comparing dabrafenib to dacarbazine (DTIC) in previously untreated patients with BRAF V600E mutation positive advanced (unresectable Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma. Patients with melanoma driven by BRAF mutations other than V600E were excluded.
The primary objective for this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dabrafenib compared to DTIC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. Patients on the DTIC arm were allowed to cross over to dabrafenib after independent radiographic confirmation of initial progression. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. Sixty percent of patients were male and 99.6 % were Caucasian ; the median age was 52 years with 21 % of patients being ≥ 65 years, 98.4 % had ECOG status of 0 or 1, and 97 % of patients had metastatic disease.
At the pre-specified analysis with a 19 December 2011 data cut, a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of PFS (HR = 0.30; 95 % Cl 0.18, 0.51; p < 0.0001) was achieved. Efficacy results from the primary analysis and a post-hoc analysis with 6-months additional follow up are summarized in Table 8. Overall survival data from a further post-hoc analysis based on a 18 December 2012 data cut are shown in Figure 3.
Table 8: Efficacy in previously untreated patients (BREAK-3 Study, 25 June 2012)

Data as of December 19, 2011

Data as of June 25, 2012

 

Dabrafenib

N=187

DTIC

N=63

Dabrafenib

N=187

DTIC

N=63

Progression-free survival

 

Median, months (95 % CI)

5.1 (4.9, 6.9)

2.7 (1.5, 3.2)

6.9 (5.2,9.0)

2.7 (1.5,3.2)

HR (95 % CI)

0.30 (0.18, 0.51)

P < 0.0001

0.37 (0.24, 0.58)

P < 0.0001

Overall responsea

 

% (95 % CI)

53 (45.5, 60.3)

19 (10.2, 30.9)

59 (51.4, 66.0)

24 (14, 36.2)

Duration of response

 

Median, months (95 % CI)

N=99

5.6 (4.8, NR)

N=12

NR (5.0, NR)

N=110

8.0 (6.6, 11.5)

N=15

7.6 (5.0, 9.7)

Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; DTIC: dacarbazine; HR: hazard ratio; NR: not reached
a. Defined as confirmed complete +partial response.
As of 25 June 2012 cut-off, thirty five subjects (55.6 %) of the 63 randomized to DTIC had crossed over to dabrafenib and 63 % of subjects randomised to dabrafenib and 79 % of subjects randomised to DTIC had progressed or died. Median PFS after cross-over was 4.4 months.
Table 9: Survival data from the primary analysis and post-hoc analyses

Cut-off date

Treatment

Number of deaths (%)

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

December 19, 2011

DTIC

9 (14%)

0.61 (0.25, 1.48) (a)

dabrafenib

21 (11%)

June 25, 2012

DTIC

21 (33%)

0.75 (0.44, 1.29) (a)

dabrafenib

55 (29%)

December 18, 2012

DTIC

28 (44%)

0.76 (0.48, 1.21) (a)

dabrafenib

78 (42%)

(a) Patients were not censored at the time of cross-over
Overall survival data from a further post-hoc analysis based on the 18 December 2012 data cut demonstrated a 12 month OS rate of 63 % and 70 % for DTIC and dabrafenib treatments respectively.
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (BREAK-3) (18 December 2012)


Patients with brain metastases (Results from the Phase II study (BREAK-MB)BREAK-MB was a multi-centre, open-label, two-cohort, Phase II study designed to evaluate the intracranial response of dabrafenib in subjects with histologically confirmed (Stage IV) BRAF-mutation positive (V600E or V600K) melanoma metastatic to the brain. Subjects were enrolled into Cohort A (subjects with no prior local therapy for brain metastasis) or Cohort B (subjects who received prior local therapy for brain metastasis).
The primary endpoint of the study was overall intracranial response rate (OIRR) in the V600E patient population, as assessed by investigators. The confirmed OIRR and other efficacy results per investigator assessment are presented in Table 10.
Table 10: Efficacy data in patients with brain metastases (BREAK-MB Study)

All Treated Subjects Population

 

BRAF V600E (Primary)

BRAF V600K

 

Cohort A

N=74

Cohort B

N=65

Cohort A

N=15

Cohort B

N=18

Overall intracranial response rate, % (95 % CI)a

 
 

39% (28.0, 51.2)

P < 0.001b

31% (19.9, 43.4)

P < 0.001b

7% (0.2, 31.9)

22% (6.4, 47.6)

Duration of intracranial response, median, months (95% CI)

 

N=29

4.6 (2.8, NR)

N=20

6.5 (4.6, 6.5)

N=1

2.9 (NR, NR)

N=4

3.8 (NR, NR)

Overall response, % (95% CI)a

 

38% (26.8, 49.9)

31% (19.9, 43.4)

0 (0, 21.8)

28% (9.7, 53.5)

Duration of response, median, months (95% CI)

 

N=28

5.1 (3.7, NR)

N=20

4.6 (4.6, 6.5)

NA

N=5

3.1 (2.8, NR)

Progression-free survival, median, months (95% CI)

 

3.7 (3.6, 5.0)

3.8 (3.6, 5.5)

1.9 (0.7, 3.7)

3.6 (1.8, 5.2)

Overall survival, median, months (95% CI)

Median, months

7.6 (5.9, NR)

7.2 (5.9, NR)

3.7 (1.6, 5.2)

5.0 (3.5, NR)

Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; NR: not reached; NA: not applicable

a - Confirmed response.

b –This study was designed to support or reject the null hypothesis of OIRR ≤10% (based on historical results) in favour of the alternative hypothesis of OIRR ≥ 30% in BRAF V600E mutation positive subjects

Patients who were previously untreated or failed at least one prior systemic therapy (Results from the Phase II [BREAK-2])
BRF113710 (BREAK-2) was a multi-centre, single-arm, study that enrolled 92 subjects with metastatic melanoma (Stage IV) with confirmed BRAF V600E or V600K mutation-positive melanoma.
The investigator assessed confirmed response rate in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic melanoma (n=76) was 59 % (95 % CI: 48.2, 70.3) and the median duration of response was 5.2 months (95 % CI: 3.9, not calculable) based on a median follow-up time of 6.5 months. In patients with BRAF V600K mutation positive metastatic melanoma (n=16) the response rate was 13 % (95 % CI: 0.0, 28.7) with a median duration of response of 5.3 months (95 % CI: 3.7, 6.8). Although limited by the low number of patients, median OS appeared consistent with data in patients with BRAF V600E positive tumours.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with dabrafenib in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in melanoma (see section 4.2 for information on paediatricuse).
5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties
Absorption
Dabrafenib is absorbed orally with median time to achieve peak plasma concentration of 2 hours post-dose. Mean absolute bioavailability of oral dabrafenib is 95 % (90 % CI: 81, 110 %). Dabrafenib exposure (Cmax and AUC) increased in a dose proportional manner between 12 and 300 mg following single-dose administration, but the increase was less than dose-proportional after repeat twice daily dosing. A decrease in exposure was observed with repeat dosing, likely due to induction of its own metabolism. Mean accumulation AUC Day 18/Day 1 ratios was 0.73. Following administration of 150 mg twice daily, geometric mean Cmax, AUC(0-) and predose concentration (C) were 1478 ng/ml, 4341 ng*hr/ml and 26 ng/ml, respectively.
Administration of dabrafenib with food reduced the bioavailability (Cmax and AUC decreased by 51 % and 31 % respectively) and delayed absorption of dabrafenib capsules when compared to the fasted state.
Distribution
Dabrafenib binds to human plasma protein and is 99.7 % bound. The steady-state volume of distribution following intravenous microdose administration is 46 L.
Dabrafenib is a substrate of human P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and murine BCRP in vitro. However, these transporters have minimal impact on dabrafenib oral bioavailability and elimination and the risk for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with inhibitors of Pgp or BCRP is low. Dabrafenib is not an in vitro substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3 or OATP2B1 transporters.
Neither dabrafenib nor its 3 main metabolites were demonstrated to be inhibitors of Pgp in vitro.
Biotransformation
The metabolism of dabrafenib is primarily mediated by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 to form hydroxy-dabrafenib, which is further oxidized via CYP3A4 to form carboxy-dabrafenib. Carboxy-dabrafenib can be decarboxylated via a non-enzymatic process to form desmethyl-dabrafenib. Carboxy-dabrafenib is excreted in bile and urine. Desmethyl-dabrafenib may also be formed in the gut and reabsorbed. Desmethyl-dabrafenib is metabolized by CYP3A4 to oxidative metabolites. Hydroxy-dabrafenib terminal half-life parallels that of parent with a half-life of 10 hrs while the carboxy- and desmethyl-metabolites exhibited longer half-lives (21-22 hours). Mean metabolite to parent AUC ratios following repeat-dose administration were 0.9, 11 and 0.7 for hydroxy-, carboxy-, and desmethyl-dabrafenib, respectively. Based on exposure, relative potency, and pharmacokinetic properties, both hydroxy- and desmethyl-dabrafenib are likely to contribute to the clinical activity of dabrafenib; while the activity of carboxy-dabrafenib is not likely to be significant.
Elimination
Terminal half-life following an intravenous single microdose is 2.6 hours. Dabrafenib terminal half-life after a single dose is 8 hours due to absorption-limited elimination after oral administration (flip-flop pharmacokinetics). IV plasma clearance is 12 L/hr.
After an oral dose, the major route of elimination of dabrafenib is metabolism, mediated via CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. Dabrafenib related material is excreted primarily in faeces, with 71 % of an oral dose recovered in faeces and 23 % in urine as metabolites only.
Special patient populations
Hepatic impairment
A population pharmacokinetic analysis indicates that mildly elevated bilirubin and/or AST levels (based on National Cancer Institute [NCI] classification) do not significantly affect dabrafenib oral clearance. In addition, mild hepatic impairment as defined by bilirubin and AST did not have a significant effect on dabrafenib metabolite plasma concentrations. No data are available in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. As hepatic metabolism and biliary secretion are the primary routes of elimination of dabrafenib and its metabolites, administration of dabrafenib should be undertaken with caution in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (see section 4.2).
Renal impairment
A population pharmacokinetic analysis suggests that mild renal impairment does not affect oral clearance of dabrafenib. Although data in moderate renal impairment are limited these data may indicate no clinically relevant effect. No data are available in subjects with severe renal impairment (see section 4.2).
Elderly
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, age had no significant effect on dabrafenib pharmacokinetics. Age greater than 75 years was a significant predictor of carboxy- and desmethyl-dabrafenib plasma concentrations with a 40 % greater exposure in subjects ≥ 75 years of age, relative to subjects < 75 years old.
Body weight and gender
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, gender and weight were found to influence dabrafenib oral clearance; weight also impacted oral volume of distribution and distributional clearance. These pharmacokinetic differences were not considered clinically relevant.
Race
There are insufficient data to evaluate the potential effect of race on dabrafenib pharmacokinetics.
Paediatric population
No studies have been conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib in paediatric patients.
5.3 Preclinical safety data
Carcinogenicity studies with dabrafenib have not been conducted. Dabrafenib was not mutagenic or clastogenic using in vitro tests in bacteria and cultured mammalian cells, and an in vivo rodent micronucleus assay.
In combined female fertility, early embryonic and embryofetal development studies in rats numbers of ovarian corpora lutea were reduced in pregnant females at 300 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times human clinical exposure based on AUC), but there were no effects on estrous cycle, mating or fertility indices. Developmental toxicity including embryo-lethality and ventricular septal defects were seen at 300 mg/kg/day, and delayed skeletal development and reduced fetal body weight at ≥ 20 mg/kg/day (≥ 0.5 times human clinical exposure based on AUC).
Male fertility studies with dabrafenib have not been conducted. However, in repeat dose studies, testicular degeneration/depletion was seen in rats and dogs (≥ 0.2 times the human clinical exposure based on AUC). Testicular changes in rat and dog were still present following a 4-week recovery period (see section 4.6).
Cardiovascular effects, including coronary arterial degeneration/necrosis and/or haemorrhage, cardiac atrioventricular valve hypertrophy/haemorrhage and atrial fibrovascular proliferation were seen in dogs (≥ 2 times clinical exposure based on AUC). Focal arterial/perivascular inflammation in various tissues was observed in mice and an increased incidence of hepatic arterial degeneration and spontaneous cardiomyocyte degeneration with inflammation (spontaneous cardiomyopathy) was observed in rats (≥ 0.5 and 0.6 times clinical exposure for rats and mice respectively). Hepatic effects, including hepatocellular necrosis and inflammation, were observed in mice (≥ 0.6 times clinical exposure). Bronchoalveolar inflammation of the lungs was observed in several dogs at ≥ 20 mg/kg/day (≥ 9 times human clinical exposure based on AUC) and was associated with shallow and/or laboured breathing.
Reversible haematological effects have been observed in dogs and rats given dabrafenib. In studies of up to 13 weeks, decreases in reticulocyte counts and/or red cell mass were observed in dogs and rats (≥ 10 and 1.4 times clinical exposure, respectively).
In juvenile toxicity studies in rats, effects on growth (shorter long bone length), renal toxicity (tubular deposits, increased incidence of cortical cysts and tubular basophilia and reversible increases in urea and/or creatinine concentrations), testicular toxicity (degeneration and tubular dilation) and earlier vaginal opening (with no associated effects on ovarian weights or morphologic changes in female reproductive tissues) were observed.
Dabrafenib was phototoxic in an in vitro mouse fibroblast 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) assay.
Combination with trametinib
In a study in dogs in which trametinib and dabrafenib were given in combination for 4 weeks, signs of gastro-intestinal toxicity and decreased lymphoid cellularity of the thymus were observed at lower exposures than in dogs given trametinib alone. Otherwise, similar toxicities were observed as in comparable monotherapy studies.
6. Pharmaceutical particulars
6.1 List of excipients
Capsules content
Microcrystalline cellulose
Magnesium stearate
Colloidal silicone dioxide
Capsule shell
Red iron oxide (E172)
Titanium dioxide (E171)
Hypromellose (E464)
Printing ink:
Black iron oxide (E172)
Shellac
Propylene glycol
6.2 Incompatibilities
Not applicable.
6.3 Shelf life
2 years.
6.4 Special precautions for storage
This medicinal product does not require any special storage conditions.
6.5 Nature and contents of container
Opaque white high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottle with polypropylene screw cap and a silica gel desiccant.
Each bottle contains either 28 or 120 hard capsules
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.
6.6 Special precautions for disposal and other handling
Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.
7. Marketing authorisation holder
Novartis Europharm Limited
Frimley Business Park
Camberley GU16 7SR
United Kingdom
8. Marketing authorisation number(s)
Tafinlar 50 mg hard capsules
EU/1/13/865/001
EU/1/13/865/002
Tafinlar 75 mg hard capsules
EU/1/13/865/003
EU/1/13/865/004
9. Date of first authorisation/renewal of the authorisation
26 August 2013
10. Date of revision of the text
25 August 2015
Detailed information on this medicinal product is available on the website of the European Medicines Agency http://www.ema.europa.eu.


黑色素瘤组合疗法Tafinlar+Mekinist获欧盟批准
近日,2款黑色素瘤药物Tafinlar(dabrafenib)和Mekinist(trametinib)在欧盟监管方面收获喜讯,欧盟委员会(EC)已批准Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法用于BRAF V600突变阳性不可切除性或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗,这也是欧盟批准用于该类型黑色素瘤的首个靶向组合疗法。在2个III期研究中,与当前BRAF抑制剂单药治疗(Tafinlar或Zelboraf)的标准护理相比,Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法显著改善了BRAF V600突变阳性不可切除性或转移性黑色素瘤患者的总生存期。诺华表示,将尽快在欧盟市场推出该组合疗法,此次批准将助力该公司实现黑色素瘤领域领导者地位的目标。
转移性黑色素瘤是最严重最致命的皮肤癌类型,生存率极低,据估计,仅有20%的患者在确诊晚期黑色素瘤后生存时间能达到5年。在全球范围内,每年新增约20万例晚期黑色素瘤病例,其中约一半左右为BRAF V600阳性。基因检测能够确定患者肿瘤中是否携带BRAF突变,检测的结果在患者的预后及治疗决策中具有重要作用。
Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法的获批,是基于2个III期研究(COMBI-d和COMBI-v)的积极数据。这些研究在BRAF V600突变阳性不可切除性或转移性黑色素瘤患者中开展,分别将Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法与Tafinlar单药疗法及Zelboraf单药疗法进行了对比。来自COMBI-d研究的数据显示,与Tafinlar单药疗法相比,Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法显著改善了患者的总生存期(中位OS:25.1个月 vs 18.7个月,p=0.011);随访1年和2年时,Tafinlar+Mekinist联合治疗组存活率显著高于Tafinlar单药治疗组(1年生存率:74% vs 51%;2年生存率:68% vs 42%)。COMBI-v研究则将Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法与Zelboraf单药疗法进行了对比,该研究的更新数据将在即将召开的医学会议上公布。
在美国,FDA已于2015年7月授予审核完全批准Tafinlar+Mekinist组合疗法治疗BRAF V600突变阳性转移性黑色素瘤的优先审查资格。自2014年1月以来,该组合疗法已获FDA加速批准用于经FDA批准的一款检测试剂盒确诊BRAF V600E/K突变阳性晚期黑色素瘤的治疗。
关于Tafinlar和Mekinist:
Tafinlar和Mekinist是GSK研发的2款黑色素瘤新药,均于2013年5月获FDA批准。Tafinlar为BRAF抑制剂,作为一种单药口服胶囊,适用于携带BRAF V600E突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。Mekinist为首个MEK抑制剂,作为一种单药口服片剂,适用于携带BRAF V600E或V600K突变的手术不可切除性黑色素瘤或转移性黑色素瘤成人患者的治疗。
Tafinlar不适用于野生型BRAF黑色素瘤患者的治疗。Mekinist不适用于既往接受过BRAF抑制剂疗法的患者的治疗。
转移性黑色素瘤中,约有一半携带BRAF突变,该异常突变能促使黑色素瘤生长和扩散。Tafinlar和Mekinist分别获批用于携带BRAF V600E突变的患者,该突变约占转移性黑色素瘤所有BRAF V600突变的85%。Mekinist同时获批用于携带BRAF V600K突变的患者,该突变约占转移性黑色素瘤所有BRAF V600突变的10%。
-----------------------------------------------------
产品国家:欧洲
原产地英文商品名:
Tafinlar 50mg/capsule 28caps
原产地英文药品名:
dabrafenib
中文参考商品译名:
Tafinlar 50毫克/胶囊 28胶囊/瓶
中文参考药品译名:
达拉非尼
生产厂家中文参考译名:      
葛兰素史克
生产厂家英文名:
GlaxoSmithKline
-----------------------------------------------------
产品国家:欧洲
原产地英文商品名:
Tafinlar 75mg/capsule 28caps
原产地英文药品名:
dabrafenib
中文参考商品译名:
Tafinlar 75毫克/胶囊 28胶囊/瓶
中文参考药品译名:
达拉非尼
生产厂家中文参考译名:      
葛兰素史克
生产厂家英文名:
GlaxoSmithKline
-----------------------------------------------------
产品国家:德国
原产地英文商品名:
Tafinlar 50mg/capsule 120caps
原产地英文药品名:
dabrafenib
中文参考商品译名:
Tafinlar 50毫克/胶囊 120胶囊/瓶
中文参考药品译名:
达拉非尼
生产厂家中文参考译名:      
葛兰素史克
生产厂家英文名:
GlaxoSmithKline
-----------------------------------------------------
产品国家:德国
原产地英文商品名:
Tafinlar 75mg/capsule 120caps
原产地英文药品名:
dabrafenib
中文参考商品译名:
Tafinlar 75毫克/胶囊 120胶囊/瓶
中文参考药品译名:
达拉非尼
生产厂家中文参考译名:      
葛兰素史克
生产厂家英文名:
GlaxoSmithKline

责任编辑:admin


相关文章
Zydelig(idelalisib filmcoated tablets)
Sutent(Sunitinib Malate Capsules)
索拉非尼司特片|NEXAVAR(Sorafenib Tosilate tablets)
卡博替尼混合胶囊|Cometriq(cabozantinib capsules)
卡博替尼[混合]胶囊|COMETRIQ(CABOZANTINIB S-MALATE)
尼达尼布胶囊|Ofev(nintedanib)capsules
阿法替尼片|Gilotrif(Afatinib filmcoated tablets)
舒尼替尼胶囊|Sutent(sunitinib malate cap)
JAKAFI(RUXOLITINIB PHOSPHATE)Tablets
Jakafi(Ruxolitinib)获美国FDA批准添新适应症
Cometriq(Cabozantinib Capsules)卡博替尼胶囊
 

最新文章

更多

· 纳武单抗注射剂|OPDIVO(...
· Yervoy Injection(易普...
· 易普利姆玛注射液|Yervo...
· KEYTRUDA powder infusi...
· Yervoy(Ipilimumab sol...
· KEYTRUDA(pembrolizuma...
· Opdivo(nivolumab)Injection
· Zelboraf tab(Vémurafé...
· Opdivo(nivolumav)注射剂
· Keytruda(pembrolizumab...

推荐文章

更多

· 纳武单抗注射剂|OPDIVO(...
· Yervoy Injection(易普...
· 易普利姆玛注射液|Yervo...
· KEYTRUDA powder infusi...
· Yervoy(Ipilimumab sol...
· KEYTRUDA(pembrolizuma...
· Opdivo(nivolumab)Injection
· Zelboraf tab(Vémurafé...
· Opdivo(nivolumav)注射剂
· Keytruda(pembrolizumab...

热点文章

更多

· Yervoy Injection(易普...
· 纳武单抗注射剂|OPDIVO(...