繁体中文
设为首页
加入收藏
当前位置:药品说明书与价格首页 >> 肿瘤 >> 前列腺癌(睾丸癌,膀胱癌) >> 药品推荐 >> Busulfex injection(白消安注射液)

Busulfex injection(白消安注射液)

2014-09-03 15:00:03  作者:新特药房  来源:互联网  浏览次数:144  文字大小:【】【】【
简介: 英文药名:Busulfex injection〔Busulfan〕 中文药名:白消安注射液 生产厂家:大冢制药药品介绍药物类别造血干细胞移植预处理药物批准上市日期:2009年3月商標名 Busulfex injection 60mg 一般名 ...

英文药名:Busulfex injection〔Busulfan〕

中文药名:白消安注射液

生产厂家:大冢制药
药品介绍
药物类别
造血干细胞移植预处理药物
批准上市日期:2009年3月
商標名
Busulfex injection 60mg
一般名
ブスルファン〔Busulfan(JAN)〕
化学名
tetramethylene bis(methanesulfonate)
構造式

分子式
C6H14O6S2
分子量
246.30
融点
115~118℃
性状
它是一种白色的结晶性粉末。微溶到丙酮,极微溶于乙醇,并且几乎不溶于水。
操作注意事项
1.  该药物是在制备后,可以尽快使用。
2. 这种药物是戴上手套,口罩,防护眼镜等的准备,要充分注意。如果此解决方案连接皮肤,粘膜,如眼睛,立刻用大量清水冲洗。
审批条件
通过实施各种情况下的使用,调查的结果,而从审判案件在全国已根据一定数量的,直到它被集成在案件极为有限,数据后市场,此药以及了解患者的使用的背景资料,收集关于此药的疗效和安全性的早期数据,采取必要的措施,正确使用此药。
【适 应 症】
本品适用于联合环磷酰胺,作为慢性髓性白血病异基因造血基因血干细胞移植的预处理方案.
【用法用量】
本品通过中心静脉导管给药,每次给药需输住2小时,每6小时一次,连续4天,共16次.在组成骨髓或外周血祖细胞移植预处理方案时,本品的成人剂量通常为0.8mg/kg,取理想体重或实际体重的低值,每6小时给药一次连续4天(共16次)对肥胖或特别肥胖的患者,本品应按校准的理想体重给药.理想体重(IBW)的计算公式如下(身高cm,体重kg):IBW(kg,男性)=50=0.91*(身高cm-152)  校准的理想体重(AIBW)公式:AIBW=IBW+0.25*(实际体重-IBW).在骨髓移植前3天,本品第16天给药之后6小时,给予环磷酰胺,剂量为60mg/kg,每次静注1小时,每天一次共2天
包装规格
※Busulfex静脉滴注60毫克/1瓶


制造厂商
大冢制药有限公司
完整资料附件:http://www.info.pmda.go.jp/go/pack/4213400A2025_4_01/

Caution: Must be diluted prior to use.

Rx only

WARNING

BUSULFEX® (busulfan) Injection is a potent cytotoxic drug that causes profound myelosuppression at the recommended dosage. It should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician who is experienced in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the use of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs and the management of patients with severe pancytopenia. Appropriate management of therapy and complications is only possible when adequate diagnostic and treatment facilities are readily available. SEE "WARNINGS" SECTION FOR INFORMATION REGARDING BUSULFAN-INDUCED PANCYTOPENIA IN HUMANS.

DESCRIPTION

Busulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent known chemically as 1,4-butanediol, dimethanesulfonate. BUSULFEX® (busulfan) Injection is intended for intravenous administration. It is supplied as a clear, colorless, sterile, solution in 10mL single use vials. Each vial of BUSULFEX contains 60mg (6mg/mL) of busulfan, the active ingredient, a white crystalline powder with a molecular formula of CH3SO2O(CH2)4OSO2CH3 and a molecular weight of 246g/mole. Busulfan is dissolved in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) 33% vol/vol and Polyethylene Glycol 400, 67% vol/vol. The solubility of busulfan in water is 0.1g/L and the pH of BUSULFEX diluted to approximately 0.5mg/mL busulfan in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP as recommended for infusion reflects the pH of the diluent used and ranges from 3.4 to 3.9.

BUSULFEX is intended for dilution with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP prior to intravenous infusion.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Busulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent in which two labile methanesulfonate groups are attached to opposite ends of a four‑carbon alkyl chain. In aqueous media, busulfan hydrolyzes to release the methanesulfonate groups. This produces reactive carbonium ions that can alkylate DNA. DNA damage is thought to be responsible for much of the cytotoxicity of busulfan.

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetics of BUSULFEX were studied in 59 patients participating in a prospective trial of a BUSULFEX-cyclophosphamide preparatory regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor stem cell transplantation. Patients received 0.8mg/kg BUSULFEX every sixhours, for a total of 16 doses over four days. Fifty-five of fifty-nine patients (93%) administered BUSULFEX maintained AUC values below the target value (<1500µM∙min).

Table 1: Steady State Pharmacokinetic Parameters Following Busulfex® (busulfan) Infusion (0.8mg/kg; N=59)
Mean CV (%) Range
*
Clearance normalized to actual body weight for all patients.
Cmax (ng/mL) 1222 18 496-1684
AUC(µM∙min) 1167 20 556-1673
CL (mL/min/kg)* 2.52 25 1.49-4.31
BUSULFEX pharmacokinetics showed consistency between dose 9 and dose 13 as demonstrated by reproducibility of steady state Cmax and a low coefficient of variation for this parameter.

In a pharmacokinetic study of BUSULFEX in 24 pediatric patients, the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) estimates of BUSULFEX for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were determined. For actual body weight, PPK estimates of CL and V were 4.04L/hr/20kg (3.37mL/min/kg; interpatient variability 23%); and 12.8L/20kg (0.64L/kg; interpatient variability 11%).

Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion

Studies of distribution, metabolism, and elimination of BUSULFEX have not been done; however, the literature on oral busulfan is relevant. Additionally, for modulating effects on pharmacodynamic parameters see Drug Interactions.

Distribution

Busulfan achieves concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid approximately equal to those in plasma. Irreversible binding to plasma elements, primarily albumin, has been estimated to be 32.4±2.2% which is consistent with the reactive electrophilic properties of busulfan.

Metabolism

Busulfan is predominantly metabolized by conjugation with glutathione, both spontaneously and by glutathione S-transferase (GST) catalysis. This conjugate undergoes further extensive oxidative metabolism in the liver.

Excretion

Following administration of 14C‑labeled busulfan to humans, approximately 30% of the radioactivity was excreted into the urine over 48hours; negligible amounts were recovered in feces. The incomplete recovery of radioactivity may be due to the formation of long-lived metabolites or due to nonspecific alkylation of macromolecules.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Documentation of the safety and efficacy of busulfan as a component of a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell reconstitution is derived from two sources: i) analysis of a prospective clinical trial of BUSULFEX that involved 61 patients diagnosed with various hematologic malignancies, and ii) the published reports of randomized, controlled trials that employed high-dose oral busulfan as a component of a conditioning regimen for transplantation, which were identified in a literature review of five established commercial databases.

The prospective trial was a single-arm, open-label study in 61 patients who received BUSULFEX as part of a conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study included patients with acute leukemia past first remission (first or subsequent relapse), with high-risk first remission, or with induction failure; chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis; primary refractory or resistant relapsed Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; and myelodysplastic syndrome. Forty-eightpercent of patients (29/61) were heavily pretreated, defined as having at least one of the following: prior radiation, ≥3 prior chemotherapeutic regimens, or prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Seventy-five percent of patients (46/61) were transplanted with active disease.

Patients received 16 BUSULFEX doses of 0.8mg/kg every 6hours as a two‑hour infusion for 4days, followed by cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg once per day for twodays (BuCy2 regimen). All patients received 100% of their scheduled BUSULFEX regimen. No dose adjustments were made. After one rest day, allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells were infused. The efficacy parameters in this study were myeloablation (defined as one or more of the following: absolute neutrophil count [ANC] less than 0.5×109/L, absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] less than 0.1×109/L, thrombocytopenia defined as a platelet count less than 20,000/mm3 or a platelet transfusion requirement) and engraftment (ANC≥0.5×109/L).

All patients (61/61) experienced myeloablation. The median time to neutropenia was 4 days. All eva luable patients (60/60) engrafted at a median of 13days post-transplant (range 9 to 29days); one patient was considered non-eva luable because he died of a fungal pneumonia 20days after BMT and before engraftment occurred. All but 13 of the patients were treated with prophylactic G-CSF. Evidence of donor cell engraftment and chimerism was documented in all patients who had a chromosomal sex marker or leukemic marker (43/43), and no patient with chimeric evidence of allogeneic engraftment suffered a later loss of the allogeneic graft. There were no reports of graft failure in the overall study population. The median number of platelet transfusions per patient was 6, and the median number of red blood cell transfusions per patient was 4.

Twenty-three patients (38%) relapsed at a median of 183days post-transplant (range 36 to 406days). Sixty-twopercent of patients (38/61) were free from disease with a median follow-up of 269days post-transplant (range 20 to 583days). Forty-three patients (70%) were alive with a median follow up of 288days post-transplant (range 51 to 583days). There were two deaths before BMT Day +28 and six additional patients died by BMT Day +100. Ten patients (16%) died after BMT Day +100, at a median of 199days post-transplant (range 113 to 275days).

Oral Busulfan Literature Review

Four publications of randomized, controlled trials that eva luated a high-dose oral busulfan-containing conditioning regimen (busulfan 4mg/kg/d ×4days + cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg/d ×2days) for allogeneic transplantation in the setting of CML were identified. Two of the studies (Clift and Devergie) had populations confined to CML in chronic phase that were randomized between conditioning with busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) and cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (CY/TBI). A total of 138 patients were treated with BU/CY in these studies. The populations of the two remaining studies (Ringden and Blume) included patients with CML, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In the Nordic BMT Group study published by Ringden, et al., 57 patients had CML, and of those, 30 were treated with BU/CY. Patients with CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, and blast crisis were eligible for this study. The participants with CML (34/122 patients) in a SWOG study published by Blume, et al., had disease beyond first chronic phase. Twenty of those CML patients were treated with BU/CY, and the TBI comparator arm utilized etoposide instead of cyclophosphamide.

Table 2 summarizes the efficacy analyses reported from these 4 studies.

Table 2: Summary of efficacy analyses from the randomized, controlled trials utilizing a high dose oral busulfan-containing conditioning regimen identified in a literature review.
Clift, 1994
CML Chronic Phase;
BU = Busulfan
CY = Cyclophosphamide
TBI = Total Body Irradiation
DFS = Disease Free Survival
ANC = Absolute Neutrophil Count
*
Eto = etoposide. TBI was combined with etoposide in the comparator arm of this study.
3year Overall
Survival
3year DFS
(p=0.43)
Relapse Time to Engraftment
(ANC≥500)
BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI
80% 80% 71% 68% 13% 13% 22.6days 22.3days
Devergie, 1995
CML Chronic Phase;
5year Overall Survival
(p=0.5)
5year DFS (p=0.75) Relapse (Relative Risk analysis BU/CY:CY/TBI)
(p=0.04)
Time to Engraftment
(ANC≥500)
BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI
60.6%
±11.7%
65.8%
±12.5%
59.1%
±11.8%
51.0%
±14%
4.10
(95%CI =1.00-20.28)
None
Given
None
Given
Ringden, 1994
CML, AML, ALL;
3year Overall
Survival
(p<0.03)
3year Relapse Free
Survival
(p=0.065)
Relapse
(p=0.9)
Time to Engraftment
(ANC>500)
BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI BU/CY CY/TBI
62% 76% 56% 67% 22% 26% 20days 20days
Blume, 1993*
CML, AML, ALL; Relative Risk Analysis BU/CY: Etoposide/TBI
RR of Mortality DFS RR of Relapse
(Relative Risk analysis
BU/CY:Eto/TBI)
Time to Engraftment
BU/CY Eto/TBI BU/CY Eto/TBI BU/CY Eto/TBI BU/CY Eto/TBI
0.97
(95% CI=0.64-1.48)
Not Given 1.02
(95% CI=0.56-1.86)
Not Given
INDICATIONS AND USAGE

BUSULFEX® (busulfan) Injection is indicated for use in combination with cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

BUSULFEX is contraindicated in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any of its components.

WARNINGS

BUSULFEX should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Appropriate management of complications arising from its administration is possible only when adequate diagnostic and treatment facilities are readily available.

The following warnings pertain to different physiologic effects of BUSULFEX in the setting of allogeneic transplantation.

Hematologic

The most frequent serious consequence of treatment with BUSULFEX at the recommended dose and schedule is profound myelosuppression, occurring in all patients. Severe granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or any combination thereof may develop. Frequent complete blood counts, including white blood cell differentials, and quantitative platelet counts should be monitored during treatment and until recovery is achieved. Absolute neutrophil counts dropped below 0.5×109/L at a median of 4days post-transplant in 100% of patients treated in the BUSULFEX clinical trial. The absolute neutrophil count recovered at a median of 13 days following allogeneic transplantation when prophylactic G-CSF was used in the majority of patients. Thrombocytopenia (<25,000/mm3 or requiring platelet transfusion) occurred at a median of 5-6days in 98% of patients. Anemia (hemoglobin <8.0g/dL) occurred in 69% of patients. Antibiotic therapy and platelet and red blood cell support should be used when medically indicated.

Neurological

Seizures have been reported in patients receiving high-dose oral busulfan at doses producing plasma drug levels similar to those achieved following the recommended dosage of BUSULFEX. Despite prophylactic therapy with phenytoin, one seizure (1/42 patients) was reported during an autologous transplantation clinical trial of BUSULFEX. This episode occurred during the cyclophosphamide portion of the conditioning regimen, 36hours after the last BUSULFEX dose. Anti-convulsant prophylactic therapy should be initiated prior to BUSULFEX treatment. Caution should be exercised when administering the recommended dose of BUSULFEX to patients with a history of a seizure disorder or head trauma or who are receiving other potentially epileptogenic drugs.

Hepatic

Current literature suggests that high busulfan area under the plasma concentration verses time curve (AUC) values (>1,500µM∙min) may be associated with an increased risk of developing hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD). Patients who have received prior radiation therapy, greater than or equal to three cycles of chemotherapy, or a prior progenitor cell transplant may be at an increased risk of developing HVOD with the recommended BUSULFEX dose and regimen. Based on clinical examination and laboratory findings, hepatic veno-occlusive disease was diagnosed in 8% (5/61) of patients treated with BUSULFEX in the setting of allogeneic transplantation, was fatal in 2/5 cases (40%), and yielded an overall mortality from HVOD in the entire study population of 2/61 (3%). Three of the five patients diagnosed with HVOD were retrospectively found to meet the Jones' criteria. The incidence of HVOD reported in the literature from the randomized, controlled trials (see CLINICAL STUDIES) was 7.7%-12%.

Cardiac

Cardiac tamponade has been reported in pediatric patients with thalassemia (8/400 or 2% in one series) who received high doses of oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as the preparatory regimen for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Six of the eight children died and two were saved by rapid pericardiocentesis. Abdominal pain and vomiting preceded the tamponade in most patients. No patients treated in the BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection clinical trials experienced cardiac tamponade.

Pulmonary

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia with pulmonary fibrosis is a rare but serious complication following chronic busulfan therapy. The average onset of symptoms is 4years after therapy (range 4months to 10years).

Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity, Impairment of Fertility

Busulfan is a mutagen and a clastogen. In in vitro tests it caused mutations in Salmonella typhimurium and Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosomal aberrations induced by busulfan have been reported in vivo (rats, mice, hamsters, and humans) and in vitro (rodent and human cells). The intravenous administration of busulfan (48mg/kg given as biweekly doses of 12mg/kg, or 30% of the total BUSULFEX dose on a mg/m2 basis) has been shown to increase the incidence of thymic and ovarian tumors in mice. Four cases of acute leukemia occurred among 19 patients who became pancytopenic in a 243 patient study incorporating busulfan as adjuvant therapy following surgical resection of bronchogenic carcinoma. Clinical appearance of leukemia was observed 5-8years following oral busulfan treatment. Busulfan is a presumed human carcinogen.

Ovarian suppression and amenorrhea commonly occur in premenopausal women undergoing chronic, low-dose busulfan therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Busulfan depleted oocytes of female rats. Busulfan induced sterility in male rats and hamsters. Sterility, azoospermia and testicular atrophy have been reported in male patients.

The solvent DMA may also impair fertility. A DMA daily dose of 0.45g/kg/d given to rats for ninedays (equivalent to 44% of the daily dose of DMA contained in the recommended dose of BUSULFEX on a mg/m2 basis) significantly decreased spermatogenesis in rats. A single sc dose of 2.2g/kg (27% of the total DMA dose contained in BUSULFEX on a mg/m2 basis) four days after insemination terminated pregnancy in 100% of tested hamsters.

Pregnancy

Busulfan may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Busulfan produced teratogenic changes in the offspring of mice, rats and rabbits when given during gestation. Malformations and anomalies included significant alterations in the musculoskeletal system, body weight gain, and size. In pregnant rats, busulfan produced sterility in both male and female offspring due to the absence of germinal cells in the testes and ovaries. The solvent, DMA, may also cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In rats, DMA doses of 400mg/kg/d (about 40% of the daily dose of DMA in the BUSULFEX dose on a mg/m2 basis) given during organogenesis caused significant developmental anomalies. The most striking abnormalities included anasarca, cleft palate, vertebral anomalies, rib anomalies, and serious anomalies of the vessels of the heart. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of either busulfan or DMA in pregnant women. If BUSULFEX is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while receiving BUSULFEX, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus. Women of childbearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant.

PRECAUTIONS

Hematologic

At the recommended dosage of BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection, profound myelosuppression is universal, and can manifest as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or a combination thereof. Patients should be monitored for signs of local or systemic infection or bleeding. Their hematologic status should be eva luated frequently.

Information for Patients

The increased risk of a second malignancy should be explained to the patient.

Laboratory Tests

Patients receiving BUSULFEX should be monitored daily with a complete blood count, including differential count and quantitative platelet count, until engraftment has been demonstrated.

To detect hepatotoxicity, which may herald the onset of hepatic veno-occlusive disease, serum transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin should be eva luated daily through BMT Day +28.

Drug Interactions

Itraconazole decreases busulfan clearance by up to 25%, and may produce an AUC>1500µM∙min in some patients. Fluconazole, and the 5-HT3 antiemetics odansetron (Zofran®) and granisetron (Kytril®) have all been used with BUSULFEX.

Phenytoin increases the clearance of busulfan by 15% or more, possibly due to the induction of glutathione-S-transferase. Since the pharmacokinetics of BUSULFEX were studied in patients treated with phenytoin, the clearance of BUSULFEX at the recommended dose may be lower and exposure (AUC) higher in patients not treated with phenytoin.

Because busulfan is eliminated from the body via conjugation with glutathione, use of acetaminophen prior to (<72hours) or concurrent with BUSULFEX may result in reduced busulfan clearance based upon the known property of acetaminophen to decrease glutathione levels in the blood and tissues.

Pregnancy

Pregnancy Category D

See WARNINGS.

Nursing Mothers

It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for tumorgenicity shown for busulfan in human and animal studies, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

Special Populations

Pediatric

The effectiveness of BUSULFEX in the treatment of CML has not been specifically studied in pediatric patients. An open-label, uncontrolled study eva luated the pharmacokinetics of BUSULFEX in 24 pediatric patients receiving BUSULFEX as part of a conditioning regimen administered prior to hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for a variety of malignant hematologic (N=15) or non-malignant diseases (N=9). Patients ranged in age from 5months to 16years (median 3years). BUSULFEX dosing was targeted to achieve an area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 900-1350µM∙min with an initial dose of 0.8mg/kg or 1.0mg/kg (based on ABW) if the patient was >4 or ≤4years, respectively. The dose was adjusted based on plasma concentration after completion of dose 1.

Patients received BUSULFEX doses every sixhours as a two‑hour infusion over fourdays for a total of 16 doses, followed by cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg once daily for fourdays. After one rest day, hematopoietic progenitor cells were infused. All patients received phenytoin as seizure prophylaxis. The target AUC (900-1350±5%µM∙min) for BUSULFEX was achieved at dose 1 in 71% (17/24) of patients. Steady state pharmacokinetic testing was performed at dose 9 and 13. BUSULFEX levels were within the target range for 21 of 23 eva luable patients.

All 24 patients experienced neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.5×109/L) and thrombocytopenia (platelet transfusions or platelet count <20,000/mm3). Seventy-ninepercent (19/24) of patients experienced lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count <0.1×109). In 23 patients, the ANC recovered to >0.5×109/L (median time to recovery = BMT day +13; range = BMT day +9 to +22). One patient who died on day +20 had not recovered to an ANC>0.5×109/L.

Four (17%) patients died during the study. Two patients died within 28days of transplant; one with pneumonia and capillary leak syndrome, and the other with pneumonia and veno-occlusive disease. Two patients died prior to day 100; one due to progressive disease and one due to multi-organ failure.

Adverse events were reported in all 24 patients during the study period (BMT day -10 through BMT day +28) or post-study surveillance period (day +29 through +100). These included vomiting (100%), nausea (83%), stomatitis (79%), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) (21%), graft-versus host disease (GVHD) (25%), and pneumonia (21%).

Based on the results of this 24-patient clinical trial, a suggested dosing regimen of BUSULFEX in pediatric patients is shown in the following dosing nomogram:

BUSULFEX Dosing Nomogram
Patient's Actual
Body Weight (ABW)
BUSULFEX Dosage
≤12kgs 1.1(mg/kg)
>12kgs 0.8(mg/kg)

Simulations based on a pediatric population pharmacokinetic model indicate that approximately 60% of pediatric patients will achieve a target BUSULFEX exposure (AUC) between 900 to 1350µM∙min with the first dose of BUSULFEX using this dosing nomogram. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment following the first dose of BUSULFEX is recommended.

Dose Adjustment Based on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Instructions for measuring the AUC of busulfan at dose 1 (see Blood Sample Collection for AUC Determination), and the formula for adjustment of subsequent doses to achieve the desired target AUC (1125µM∙min), are provided below.

Adjusted dose (mg) = Actual Dose (mg) × Target AUC (µM∙min)/Actual AUC (µM∙min)

For example, if a patient received a dose of 11mg busulfan and if the corresponding AUC measured was 800µM∙min, for a target AUC of 1125µM∙min, the target mg dose would be:

Mg dose =11mg ×1125µM∙min /800µM∙min =15.5mg

Busulfex dose adjustment may be made using this formula and instructions below.

Blood Sample Collection for AUC Determination

Calculate the AUC (µM∙min) based on blood samples collected at the following time points:

For dose 1:2hr (end of infusion), 4hr and 6hr (immediately prior to the next scheduled BUSULFEX administration). Actual sampling times should be recorded.

For doses other than dose 1: Pre-infusion (baseline), 2hr (end of infusion), 4hr and 6hr (immediately prior to the next scheduled BUSULFEX administration).

AUC calculations based on fewer than the three specified samples may result in inaccurate AUC determinations.

For each scheduled blood sample, collect one to threemL of blood into heparinized (Na or Li heparin) Vacutainer® tubes. The blood samples should be placed on wet ice immediately after collection and should be centrifuged (at 4°C) within one hour. The plasma, harvested into appropriate cryovial storage tubes, is to be frozen immediately at -20°C. All plasma samples are to be sent in a frozen state (i.e., on dry ice) to the assay laboratory for the determination of plasma busulfan concentrations.

Calculation of AUC

BUSULFEX AUC calculations may be made using the following instructions and appropriate standard pharmacokinetic formula:

Dose 1 AUCinfinity Calculation: AUCinfinity = AUC0-6hr + AUCextrapolated, where AUC0-6hr is to be estimated using the linear trapezoidal rule and AUC extrapolated can be computed by taking the ratio of the busulfan concentration at Hour 6 and the terminal elimination rate constant, λz. The λz must be calculated from the terminal elimination phase of the busulfan concentration vs. time curve. A "0" pre-dose busulfan concentration should be assumed, and used in the calculation of AUC.

If the AUC is assessed subsequent to Dose 1, steady-state AUCss (AUC0-6hr) is to be estimated from the trough, 2hr, 4hr and 6hr concentrations using the linear trapezoidal rule.

Instructions for Drug Administration and Blood Sample Collection for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

An administration set with minimal residual hold up (priming) volume (1-3mL) should be used for drug infusion to ensure accurate delivery of the entire prescribed dose and to ensure accurate collection of blood samples for therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment.

Prime the administration set tubing with drug solution to allow accurate documentation of the start time of BUSULFEX infusion. Collect the blood sample from a peripheral IV line to avoid contamination with infusing drug. If the blood sample is taken directly from the existing central venous catheter (CVC), DO NOT COLLECT THE BLOOD SAMPLE WHILE THE DRUG IS INFUSING to ensure that the end of infusion sample is not contaminated with any residual drug. At the end of infusion (2hr), disconnect the administration tubing and flush the CVC line with 5cc of normal saline prior to the collection of the end of infusion sample from the CVC port. Collect the blood samples from a different port than that used for the BUSULFEX infusion. When recording the BUSULFEX infusion stop time, do not include the time required to flush the indwelling catheter line. Discard the administration tubing at the end of the two‑hour infusion.

See Preparation for Intravenous Administration section for detailed instructions on drug preparation.

Geriatric

Five of sixty-one patients treated in the BUSULFEX clinical trial were over the age of 55 (range 57-64). All achieved myeloablation and engraftment.

Gender, Race

Adjusting BUSULFEX dosage based on gender or race has not been adequately studied.

Renal Insufficiency

BUSULFEX has not been studied in patients with renal impairment.

Hepatic Insufficiency

BUSULFEX has not been administered to patients with hepatic insufficiency.

Other

Busulfan may cause cellular dysplasia in many organs. Cytologic abnormalities characterized by giant, hyperchromatic nuclei have been reported in lymph nodes, pancreas, thyroid, adrenal glands, liver, lungs and bone marrow. This cytologic dysplasia may be severe enough to cause difficulty in the interpretation of exfoliative cytologic examinations of the lungs, bladder, breast and the uterine cervix.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Dimethylacetamide (DMA), the solvent used in the BUSULFEX formulation, was studied in 1962 as a potential cancer chemotherapy drug. In a Phase 1 trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 14.8g/m2/d for four days. The daily recommended dose of BUSULFEX contains DMA equivalent to 42% of the MTD on a mg/m2 basis. The dose-limiting toxicities in the Phase 1 study were hepatotoxicity as evidenced by increased liver transaminase (SGOT) levels and neurological symptoms as evidenced by hallucinations. The hallucinations had a pattern of onset at one day post completion of DMA administration and were associated with EEG changes. The lowest dose at which hallucinations were recognized was equivalent to 1.9times that delivered in a conditioning regimen utilizing BUSULFEX 0.8mg/kg every 6hours ×16 doses. Other neurological toxicities included somnolence, lethargy, and confusion. The relative contribution of DMA and/or other concomitant medications to neurologic and hepatic toxicities observed with BUSULFEX is difficult to ascertain.

Treatment with BUSULFEX at the recommended dose and schedule will result in profound myelosuppression in 100% of patients, including granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or a combined loss of formed elements of the blood.

Adverse reaction information is primarily derived from the clinical study (N=61) of BUSULFEX and the data obtained for high-dose oral busulfan conditioning in the setting of randomized, controlled trials identified through a literature review.

BUSULFEX Clinical Trials

In the BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection allogeneic stem cell transplantation clinical trial, all patients were treated with BUSULFEX 0.8mg/kg as a two‑hour infusion every sixhours for 16 doses over four days, combined with cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg ×2 days. Ninety-three percent (93%) of eva luable patients receiving this dose of BUSULFEX maintained an AUC less than 1,500µM∙min for dose 9, which has generally been considered the level that minimizes the risk of HVOD.

Table 3: Summary of the Incidence (≥20%) of Non-Hematologic Adverse Events through BMT Day +28 in Patients who Received BUSULFEX Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation
Non-Hematological Adverse Events* Percent Incidence
*
Includes all reported adverse events regardless of severity (toxicity grades 1-4)
BODY AS A WHOLE
Fever 80
Headache 69
Asthenia 51
Chills 46
Pain 44
Edema General 28
Allergic Reaction 26
Chest Pain 26
Inflammation at Injection Site 25
Back Pain 23
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM
Tachycardia 44
Hypertension 36
Thrombosis 33
Vasodilation 25
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
Nausea 98
Stomatitis (Mucositis) 97
Vomiting 95
Anorexia 85
Diarrhea 84
Abdominal Pain 72
Dyspepsia 44
Constipation 38
Dry Mouth 26
Rectal Disorder 25
Abdominal Enlargement 23
METABOLIC AND NUTRITIONAL SYSTEM
Hypomagnesemia 77
Hyperglycemia 66
Hypokalemia 64
Hypocalcemia 49
Hyperbilirubinemia 49
Edema 36
SGPT Elevation 31
Creatinine Increased 21
NERVOUS SYSTEM
Insomnia 84
Anxiety 72
Dizziness 30
Depression 23
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Rhinitis 44
Lung Disorder 34
Cough 28
Epistaxis 25
Dyspnea 25
SKIN AND APPENDAGES
Rash 57
Pruritus 28

The following sections describe clinically significant events occurring in the BUSULFEX clinical trials, regardless of drug attribution. For pediatric information, see Special Populations – Pediatric section.

Hematologic

At the indicated dose and schedule, BUSULFEX produced profound myelosuppression in 100% of patients. Following hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion, recovery of neutrophil counts to ≥500cells/mm3 occurred at median day 13 when prophylactic G-CSF was administered to the majority of participants on the study. The median number of platelet transfusions per patient on study was 6, and the median number of red blood cell transfusions on study was 4. Prolonged prothrombin time was reported in one patient (2%).

Gastrointestinal

Gastrointestinal toxicities were frequent and generally considered to be related to the drug. Few were categorized as serious. Mild or moderate nausea occurred in 92% of patients in the allogeneic clinical trial, and mild or moderate vomiting occurred in 95% through BMT Day +28; nausea was severe in 7%. The incidence of vomiting during BUSULFEX administration (BMT Day –7 to –4) was 43% in the allogeneic clinical trial. Grade 3-4 stomatitis developed in 26% of the participants, and Grade 3 esophagitis developed in 2%. Grade 3-4 diarrhea was reported in 5% of the allogeneic study participants, while mild or moderate diarrhea occurred in 75%. Mild or moderate constipation occurred in 38% of patients; ileus developed in 8% and was severe in 2%. Forty-fourpercent (44%) of patients reported mild or moderate dyspepsia. Twopercent (2%) of patients experienced mild hematemesis. Pancreatitis developed in 2% of patients. Mild or moderate rectal discomfort occurred in 24% of patients. Severe anorexia occurred in 21% of patients and was mild/moderate in 64%.

Hepatic

Hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 49% of patients in the allogeneic BMT trial. Grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 30% of patients within 28 days of transplantation and was considered life-threatening in 5% of these patients. Hyperbilirubinemia was associated with graft-versus-host disease in six patients and with hepatic veno-occlusive disease in 5 patients. Grade 3/4 SGPT elevations occurred in 7% of patients. Alkaline phosphatase increases were mild or moderate in 15% of patients. Mild or moderate jaundice developed in 12% of patients, and mild or moderate hepatomegaly developed in 6%.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) is a recognized potential complication of conditioning therapy prior to transplant. Based on clinical examination and laboratory findings, hepatic veno-occlusive disease was diagnosed in 8% (5/61) of patients treated with BUSULFEX in the setting of allogeneic transplantation, was fatal in 2/5 cases (40%), and yielded an overall mortality from HVOD in the entire study population of 2/61 (3%). Three of the five patients diagnosed with HVOD were retrospectively found to meet the Jones' criteria.

Graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease developed in 18% of patients (11/61) receiving allogeneic transplants; it was severe in 3%, and mild or moderate in 15%. There were 3 deaths (5%) attributed to GVHD.

Edema

Patients receiving allogeneic transplant exhibited some form of edema (79%), hypervolemia, or documented weight increase (8%); all events were reported as mild or moderate.

Infection/Fever

Fifty-onepercent (51%) of patients experienced one or more episodes of infection. Pneumonia was fatal in one patient (2%) and life-threatening in 3% of patients. Fever was reported in 80% of patients; it was mild or moderate in 78% and severe in 3%. Forty-six percent (46%) of patients experienced chills.

Cardiovascular

Mild or moderate tachycardia was reported in 44% of patients. In 7 patients (11%) it was first reported during BUSULFEX administration. Other rhythm abnormalities, which were all mild or moderate, included arrhythmia (5%), atrial fibrillation (2%), ventricular extrasystoles (2%), and third degree heart block (2%). Mild or moderate thrombosis occurred in 33% of patients, and all episodes were associated with the central venous catheter. Hypertension was reported in 36% of patients and was Grade 3/4 in 7%. Hypotension occurred in 11% of patients and was Grade 3/4 in 3%. Mild vasodilation (flushing and hot flashes) was reported in 25% of patients. Other cardiovascular events included cardiomegaly (5%), mild ECG abnormality (2%), Grade 3/4 left-sided heart failure in one patient (2%), and moderate pericardial effusion (2%). These events were reported primarily in the post-cyclophosphamide phase.

Pulmonary

Mild or moderate dyspnea occurred in 25% of patients and was severe in 2%. One patient (2%) experienced severe hyperventilation; and in 2 (3%) additional patients it was mild or moderate. Mild rhinitis and mild or moderate cough were reported in 44% and 28% of patients, respectively. Mild epistaxis events were reported in 25%. Three patients (5%) on the allogeneic study developed documented alveolar hemorrhage. All required mechanical ventilatory support and all died. Non-specific interstitial fibrosis was found on wedge biopsies performed with video assisted thoracoscopy in one patient on the allogeneic study who subsequently died from respiratory failure on BMT Day +98. Other pulmonary events, reported as mild or moderate, included pharyngitis (18%), hiccup (18%), asthma (8%), atelectasis (2%), pleural effusion (3%), hypoxia (2%), hemoptysis (3%), and sinusitis (3%).

Neurologic

The most commonly reported adverse events of the central nervous system were insomnia (84%), anxiety (75%), dizziness (30%), and depression (23%). Severity was mild or moderate except for one patient (1%) who experienced severe insomnia. One patient (1%) developed a life-threatening cerebral hemorrhage and a coma as a terminal event following multi-organ failure after HVOD. Other events considered severe included delirium (2%), agitation (2%), and encephalopathy (2%). The overall incidence of confusion was 11%, and 5% of patients were reported to have experienced hallucinations. The patient who developed delirium and hallucination on the allogeneic study had onset of confusion at the completion of BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection. The overall incidence of lethargy in the allogeneic BUSULFEX clinical trial was 7%, and somnolence was reported in 2%. One patient (2%) treated in an autologous transplantation study experienced a seizure while receiving cyclophosphamide, despite prophylactic treatment with phenytoin.

Renal

Creatinine was mildly or moderately elevated in 21% of patients. BUN was increased in 3% of patients and to a Grade 3/4 level in 2%. Seven percent of patients experienced dysuria, 15% oliguria, and 8% hematuria. There were 4 (7%) Grade 3/4 cases of hemorrhagic cystitis in the allogeneic clinical trial.

Skin

Rash (57%) and pruritus (28%) were reported; both conditions were predominantly mild. Alopecia was mild in 15% of patients and moderate in 2%. Mild vesicular rash was reported in 10% of patients and mild or moderate maculopapular rash in 8%. Vesiculo-bullous rash was reported in 10%, and exfoliative dermatitis in 5%. Erythema nodosum was reported in 2%, acne in 7%, and skin discoloration in 8%.

Metabolic

Hyperglycemia was observed in 67% of patients and Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia was reported in 15%. Hypomagnesemia was mild or moderate in 77% of patients; hypokalemia was mild or moderate in 62% and severe in 2%; hypocalcemia was mild or moderate in 46% and severe in 3%; hypophosphatemia was mild or moderate in 17%; and hyponatremia was reported in 2%.

Other

Other reported events included headache (mild or moderate 64%, severe 5%), abdominal pain (mild or moderate 69%, severe 3%), asthenia (mild or moderate 49%, severe 2%), unspecified pain (mild or moderate 43%, severe 2%), allergic reaction (mild or moderate 24%, severe 2%), injection site inflammation (mild or moderate 25%), injection site pain (mild or moderate 15%), chest pain (mild or moderate 26%), back pain (mild or moderate 23%), myalgia (mild or moderate 16%), arthralgia (mild or moderate 13%), and ear disorder in 3%.

Deaths

There were two deaths through BMT Day +28 in the allogeneic transplant setting. There were an additional six deaths BMT Day +29 through BMT Day +100 in the allogeneic transplant setting.

Post-Marketing Experience

The following adverse reactions (reported as MedRA terms) have been identified during post-approval use of BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection: febrile neutropenia; tumor lysis syndrome; thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA); severe bacterial, viral (e.g., cytomegalovirus viraemia) and fungal infections; and sepsis. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.

Oral Busulfan Literature Review

A literature review identified four randomized, controlled trials that eva luated a high-dose oral busulfan-containing conditioning regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the setting of CML (see CLINICAL STUDIES). The safety outcomes reported in those trials are summarized in Table 4 below for a mixed population of hematological malignancies (AML, CML, and ALL).

Table 4 Summary of safety analyses from the randomized, controlled trials utilizing a high dose oral busulfan-containing conditioning regimen that were identified in a literature review.
Clift
CML Chronic Phase
*
TRM = Transplantation Related Mortality
VOD = Veno-Occlusive Disease of the liver
GVHD = Graft versus Host Disease
TRM* VOD† GVHD‡ Pulmonary Hemorrhagic
Cystitis
Seizure
Death
≤100d
=4.1%
(3/73)
No Report Acute≥Grade 2
=35%
Chronic=41%
(30/73)
1 death from
Idiopathic
Interstitial
Pneumonitis
And
1 death from
Pulmonary
Fibrosis
No Report No Report
Devergie
CML Chronic Phase
TRM VOD GVHD Pulmonary Hemorrhagic
Cystitis
Seizure
38% 7.7% (5/65)
Deaths=4.6%
(3/65)
Acute≥Grade 2
=41%
(24/59 at risk)
Interstitial
Pneumonitis=
16.9% (11/65)
10.8% (7/65) No report
Ringden
CML, AML, ALL
TRM VOD GVHD Pulmonary Hemorrhagic
Cystitis
Seizure
28% 12% Acute≥Grade 2
GVHD=26%
Chronic GVHD
=45%
Interstitial
Pneumonitis
=14%
24% 6%
Blume
CML, AML, ALL
TRM VOD GVHD Pulmonary Hemorrhagic
Cystitis
Seizure
No
Report
Deaths
=4.9%
Acute≥Grade 2
GVHD=22%
(13/58 at risk)
Chronic GVHD
=31%
(14/45 at risk)
No Report No Report No Report
OVERDOSAGE

There is no known antidote to BUSULFEX other than hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. In the absence of hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation, the recommended dosage for BUSULFEX would constitute an overdose of busulfan. The principal toxic effect is profound bone marrow hypoplasia/aplasia and pancytopenia, but the central nervous system, liver, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract may be affected. The hematologic status should be closely monitored and vigorous supportive measures instituted as medically indicated. Survival after a single 140mg dose of Myleran® Tablets in an 18kg, 4‑year old child has been reported. Inadvertent administration of a greater than normal dose of oral busulfan (2.1mg/kg; total dose of 23.3mg/kg) occurred in a 2‑year old child prior to a scheduled bone marrow transplant without sequelae. An acute dose of 2.4g was fatal in a 10‑year old boy. There is one report that busulfan is dialyzable, thus dialysis should be considered in the case of overdose. Busulfan is metabolized by conjugation with glutathione, thus administration of glutathione may be considered.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

When BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection is administered as a component of the BuCy conditioning regimen prior to bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell replacement, the recommended doses are as follows:

Adults (BuCy2)

The usual adult dose is 0.8mg/kg of ideal body weight or actual body weight, whichever is lower, administered every sixhours for fourdays (a total of 16 doses). For obese, or severely obese patients, BUSULFEX should be administered based on adjusted ideal body weight. Ideal body weight (IBW) should be calculated as follows (height in cm, and weight in kg): IBW (kg; men)=50+0.91× (height in cm -152); IBW (kg; women)=45+0.91× (height in cm -152). Adjusted ideal body weight (AIBW) should be calculated as follows: AIBW= IBW +0.25× (actual weight -IBW). Cyclophosphamide is given on each of twodays as a one‑hour infusion at a dose of 60mg/kg beginning on BMT day –3, no sooner than sixhours following the 16th dose of BUSULFEX.

BUSULFEX clearance is best predicted when the BUSULFEX dose is administered based on adjusted ideal body weight. Dosing BUSULFEX based on actual body weight, ideal body weight or other factors can produce significant differences in BUSULFEX (busulfan) Injection clearance among lean, normal and obese patients.

BUSULFEX should be administered intravenously via a central venous catheter as a two‑hour infusion every sixhours for four consecutive days for a total of 16 doses. All patients should be premedicated with phenytoin as busulfan is known to cross the blood brain barrier and induce seizures. Phenytoin reduces busulfan plasma AUC by 15%. Use of other anticonvulsants may result in higher busulfan plasma AUCs, and an increased risk of VOD or seizures. In cases where other anticonvulsants must be used, plasma busulfan exposure should be monitored (See DRUG INTERACTIONS). Antiemetics should be administered prior to the first dose of BUSULFEX and continued on a fixed schedule through administration of BUSULFEX. Where available, pharmacokinetic monitoring may be considered to further optimize therapeutic targeting.

Pediatrics

The effectiveness of BUSULFEX in the treatment of CML has not been specifically studied in pediatric patients. For additional information see Special Populations -Pediatric section.

Preparation and Administration Precautions

DO NOT USE POLYCARBONATE SYRINGES OR POLYCARBONATE FILTER NEEDLES WITH BUSULFEX.

An administration set with minimal residual hold-up volume (2-5cc) should be used for product administration.

As with other cytotoxic compounds, caution should be exercised in handling and preparing the solution of BUSULFEX. Skin reactions may occur with accidental exposure. The use of gloves is recommended. If BUSULFEX or diluted BUSULFEX solution contacts the skin or mucosa, wash the skin or mucosa thoroughly with water.

BUSULFEX is a clear, colorless solution. Parenteral drug products should be visually inspected for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration whenever the solution and container permit. If particulate matter is seen in the BUSULFEX vial the drug should not be used.

Preparation for Intravenous Administration

BUSULFEX must be diluted prior to use with either 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP (normal saline) or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP (D5W). The diluent quantity should be 10times the volume of BUSULFEX, so that the final concentration of busulfan is approximately 0.5mg/mL. Calculation of the dose for a 70kg patient, would be performed as follows:

(70kg patient) × (0.8mg/kg) ÷ (6mg/mL) =9.3mL BUSULFEX (56mg total dose).

To prepare the final solution for infusion, add 9.3mL of BUSULFEX to 93mL of diluent (normal saline or D5W) as calculated below:

(9.3mL BUSULFEX) × (10) =93mL of either diluent plus the 9.3mL of BUSULFEX to yield a final concentration of busulfan of 0.54mg/mL (9.3mL ×6mg/mL ÷102.3mL =0.54mg/mL).

All transfer procedures require strict adherence to aseptic techniques, preferably employing a vertical laminar flow safety hood while wearing gloves and protective clothing.

DO NOT put the BUSULFEX into an intravenous bag or large-volume syringe that does not contain normal saline or D5W. Always add the BUSULFEX to the diluent, not the diluent to the BUSULFEX. Mix thoroughly by inverting several times.

Infusion pumps should be used to administer the diluted BUSULFEX solution. Set the flow rate of the pump to deliver the entire prescribed BUSULFEX dose over twohours. Prior to and following each infusion, flush the indwelling catheter line with approximately 5mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP. DO NOT infuse concomitantly with another intravenous solution of unknown compatibility. WARNING: RAPID INFUSION OF BUSULFEX HAS NOT BEEN TESTED AND IS NOT RECOMMENDED.

STABILITY

Unopened vials of BUSULFEX are stable until the date indicated on the package when stored under refrigeration at 2°-8°C (36°-46°F).

BUSULFEX diluted in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP is stable at room temperature (25°C) for up to 8hours but the infusion must be completed within that time. BUSULFEX diluted in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP is stable at refrigerated conditions (2°-8°C) for up to 12hours but the infusion must be completed within that time.

HOW SUPPLIED

BUSULFEX is packaged as a sterile solution in 10mL single-use clear glass vials each containing 60mg of busulfan at a concentration of 6mg/mL for intravenous use, NDC 59148-070-90.

BUSULFEX is distributed as a unit carton of eight vials NDC 59148-070-91.

Unopened vials of BUSULFEX must be stored under refrigerated conditions between 2°-8°C (36°-46°F).

责任编辑:admin


相关文章
MORIHEPAMIN(氨基酸注射液/輸液剂)
Gulucolin(甘草酸单铵/L-半胱氨酸盐酸盐水合物/甘氨酸复方注射液)
Kylit injection 5%(木糖醇注射液)
TOUJEO SOLOSTAR(甘精胰岛素[重组DNA来源]预填充笔/注射溶液)
新长效胰岛素TOUJEO注射剂获美国FDA批准上市
TOUJEO SOLOSTAR(insulin glargine injection)
FOSMICIN-S FOR INJECTION(磷霉素钠注射粉末)
VICCILLIN-S FOR INJECTION(氨苄西林/氯唑西林钠复合注射剂)
hCRH TANABE Injection(Corticorelin)可的瑞林注射剂
THAM Injection SET(Trometamol)氨丁三醇注射剂
Medway INJECTION 25%(重组人血清白蛋白注射剂)
 

最新文章

更多

· XOFIGO(RADIUM RA-223 D...
· Bicalutamide Tab(Bical...
· Jevtana(Cabazitaxel In...
· Lutrate DEPOT(leuproli...
· TEPADINA powder Inject...
· ESTRACYT Inj(磷酸雌莫...
· 恩杂鲁胺胶囊|Xtandi ca...
· ZYTIGA tablets(abirat...
· Busulfex injection(白...
· 卡巴他赛丙酮注射剂|jev...

推荐文章

更多

· XOFIGO(RADIUM RA-223 D...
· Bicalutamide Tab(Bical...
· Jevtana(Cabazitaxel In...
· Lutrate DEPOT(leuproli...
· TEPADINA powder Inject...
· ESTRACYT Inj(磷酸雌莫...
· 恩杂鲁胺胶囊|Xtandi ca...
· ZYTIGA tablets(abirat...
· Busulfex injection(白...
· 卡巴他赛丙酮注射剂|jev...

热点文章

更多